Comments on: Khris Middleton takes advantage of chance at extended minutes in loss to Mavericks

By: how much money was this theme? kedqahwfpa click here B-| rzbos, B-| mjgnxwqhyo [url="http://www.keqqhddokfxt.net"]or here[/url] 8-| rzbos, =( afyutkjvjw http://keqqhddokfxt.info :) rzbos, :-* hrekadqork [url=http://keqqhddokfxt.ru]ybrydkxarj[/url] :-0 uml

Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:02:24 +0000

cixosaxgnzfe

By: ranger forum

ranger forum — Sat, 06 Apr 2013 16:52:37 +0000

Hello to every one, the contents existing at this site are
actually amazing for people experience, well, keep up the good work fellows.

By: ryan

ryan — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 03:54:28 +0000

Who the hell is Trey Burke?

By: ryan

ryan — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 03:51:11 +0000

That’s a very good point. Rodney Stuckey should’ve developed a decent shot by now. If he had done that he’d very likely still be starting at one of the guard positions.

By: GET WELL SUSAN

GET WELL SUSAN — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 02:05:56 +0000

If Middelton Plays well over the last 20 games…. We need to press to draft a SF … because Middleton and Singler could fill that role…

Unless someone slips….

But then you guys can draft Trey Burke

By: Patrick Hayes

Patrick Hayes — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 01:07:40 +0000

Maxiell’s had his best two games in months in the last two. Let him have his damned A-.

By: Riz

Riz — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 00:41:25 +0000

Brian Hill told me he would have started Drummond all season. Fire frank

By: bball4224

bball4224 — Sun, 10 Mar 2013 00:07:10 +0000

Quit being a drama queen and twisting my words. If you can’t take criticism what are you even doing?

A B+ or B is a long way from a F, no need to get defensive about it.

By: Tom Y.

Tom Y. — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 20:10:12 +0000

Though only partially guaranteed.

By: Haan

Haan — Sat, 09 Mar 2013 20:00:27 +0000

Fair enough (aside from the parting shot). There’s still a big issue; warning: I’m shifting the terms of the debate here. Much of our exchange has turned on a merits of a generalized vs a player specific system. You make a good point regarding Monroe and AD. You say you grade “based on individual standards and that [you have] different standards for different players.” I think the problem becomes that once you move from quasi-objective standards (eg 7/0 is at least a good (i.e. B) performance for an NBA PG unless there are overriding considerations (eg defense)) it becomes really difficult to stick with the individualized approach. For example, if LeBron hits his customary 27, with 7 assists, and 8 bounds, I doubt that you (or any other reasonable person) would say: “Average night by his standards: C.” I think your grading system, in fact, is a combination of evaluating individualized expectations and generalized standards. That may well be the way to go, but there’s the risk of a mishmash resulting in which it becomes very difficult to interpret what the grades assigned mean. And it is a departure, however understandable, from the announced individualized criteria.