Comments on: Pistons defense, rebounding falls apart in loss to Orlando

By: Scott Free

Scott Free — Mon, 19 Nov 2012 05:50:05 +0000

Poor example to prove a trend. His big hang up is a poor assist to turnover ratio… well this was one of his better games in this regard… Figured he’d get a B+ for improvement (and for a point guard getting that many rebounds).

By: Patrick Hayes

Patrick Hayes — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:27:54 +0000

Giving him a B while complimenting his passing, defense and lack of turnovers is complaining about him?

By: Patrick Hayes

Patrick Hayes — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:27:12 +0000

Who is mounting Bynum?

By: Patrick Hayes

Patrick Hayes — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:26:40 +0000

“ f i was doing the assessment, then he would have received a D or F every game this year.”

Well, your grades would be wrong then. Bynum’s had a couple of good games, a couple of really bad ones and most have been in the middle.

By: Raphael

Raphael — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:25:42 +0000

This coach refushe’s to make adjustments. The only reason the starting line up changed is because Stuckey was sick and he requested to come off the bench. The second unit should be stucky, English, in the back court. Bynum shouldn’t get the mounted he’s been getting.

By: Dan

Dan — Sun, 18 Nov 2012 14:07:58 +0000

im trying to understand what this team’s defensive and offensive systems are supposed to be. At this point it seems to be ‘everyone do what you are good at’ ( with push on hard work and fundamentals). Oh and the isos for Tay, which give him ok stats on good nights but still slows down the team.

My view- Dial down complexity so the guys can play your system. And cut down the rotation. I’d sit Tay and Corey, move JJ to exclusively play at the 3.

By: Stuckey and Whoever

Stuckey and Whoever — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 22:54:49 +0000

The thing that gets me is how the team pulled it together the second half last year. Well a High School coach would say take that amount of success and develop from there. It seems like just because of a few new players coach throws in a wrench to the plans that were doing better than any other recent ones in say 4yrs, and things go to crap. Specifically in Stuckeys case, wasn’t he playing his best basketball then?? And he sure wasn’t throw in the corner while he was playing that way. Stuckey still deserves to start and I would be straight pissed If I was him too.

By: Vic

Vic — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:10:23 +0000

It’s hard for me to believe that Frank is this dense too… Even with his history of poor starts, his rotations and nonsense roster decisions are incredible. I think it’s a tank job to keep a high draft pick…Because losing veterans don’t have high trade value, even if they start and play too much

By: tarsier

tarsier — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:51:28 +0000

How do you figure? He had a good game (great in one statistical category, poor to decent in most others) and he got a good grade. If he has a great game, he’ll have a great grade. But 4-12, only getting to the line twice, only converting one of them, and 3 TOs is a far cry from “walking on water”. The 6 boards and 12 assists were fantastic, though.

By: tarsier

tarsier — Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:45:20 +0000

You have too much faith in management *cough Dumars cough*