<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dennis Rodman is now an author of a children&#8217;s book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/07/dennis-rodman-is-now-an-author-of-a-childrens-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/07/dennis-rodman-is-now-an-author-of-a-childrens-book/</link>
	<description>Your Go-To Source For Pistons Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bugsygod</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/07/dennis-rodman-is-now-an-author-of-a-childrens-book/comment-page-1/#comment-80828</link>
		<dc:creator>bugsygod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=10705#comment-80828</guid>
		<description>Well patrick that was the comparison i was making between knight and billups.  That knight is more of a billups type pg, not rose/westbrook.  If he patterns his game after billups, this is where he would see the most success.  Do i think knight will be as good as billups, as a multiple allstar/possible hall of fame player, no i dont think so.  I have always said i see him as a high level starter on a championship level team.  So this was the comparison i was making, that &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;knights style of play &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;should project to be more of a billups type pg.  

and you didnt answer the question of who Cantenella replaced?  Because the answer is no one, this was a position added to the team. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well patrick that was the comparison i was making between knight and billups.  That knight is more of a billups type pg, not rose/westbrook.  If he patterns his game after billups, this is where he would see the most success.  Do i think knight will be as good as billups, as a multiple allstar/possible hall of fame player, no i dont think so.  I have always said i see him as a high level starter on a championship level team.  So this was the comparison i was making, that <em><strong>knights style of play </strong></em>should project to be more of a billups type pg.  </p>
<p>and you didnt answer the question of who Cantenella replaced?  Because the answer is no one, this was a position added to the team. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/07/dennis-rodman-is-now-an-author-of-a-childrens-book/comment-page-1/#comment-80824</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=10705#comment-80824</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot; Is it because you think if everything goes right with knight those are players he projects to be?&quot;

Nope. 100 percent no. I like Knight. I think is ceiling is &#039;solid starter&#039; not &#039;All-Star PG.&#039; I think he should look at those players because they understand how to use their strength and how to make up for a lack of quickness. Those are things Knight desperately needs to learn. Right now, he tries to attack off the dribble like he has the speed of a Rose or Wall type player, and as we all know, he doesn&#039;t. That often leads him into making bad decisions or turning the ball over.

I think he can learn from the way those players play. I don&#039;t think he&#039;ll ever be as good as those player I mentioned. And again, that&#039;s not an insult to Knight. Those are just really, really good players.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220; Is it because you think if everything goes right with knight those are players he projects to be?&#8221;</p>
<p>Nope. 100 percent no. I like Knight. I think is ceiling is &#8216;solid starter&#8217; not &#8216;All-Star PG.&#8217; I think he should look at those players because they understand how to use their strength and how to make up for a lack of quickness. Those are things Knight desperately needs to learn. Right now, he tries to attack off the dribble like he has the speed of a Rose or Wall type player, and as we all know, he doesn&#8217;t. That often leads him into making bad decisions or turning the ball over.</p>
<p>I think he can learn from the way those players play. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;ll ever be as good as those player I mentioned. And again, that&#8217;s not an insult to Knight. Those are just really, really good players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugsygod</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/07/dennis-rodman-is-now-an-author-of-a-childrens-book/comment-page-1/#comment-80819</link>
		<dc:creator>Bugsygod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=10705#comment-80819</guid>
		<description>So who did cantenella replace?

So you don&#039;t compare knight to those guys, but based on what you see of knight those are the players he should study?  Why? Is it because you think if everything goes right with knight those are players he projects to be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who did cantenella replace?</p>
<p>So you don&#8217;t compare knight to those guys, but based on what you see of knight those are the players he should study?  Why? Is it because you think if everything goes right with knight those are players he projects to be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugsygod</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/07/dennis-rodman-is-now-an-author-of-a-childrens-book/comment-page-1/#comment-80818</link>
		<dc:creator>Bugsygod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=10705#comment-80818</guid>
		<description>Where was it ever stated this was done as a cost  savings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where was it ever stated this was done as a cost  savings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/07/dennis-rodman-is-now-an-author-of-a-childrens-book/comment-page-1/#comment-80815</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=10705#comment-80815</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Catanella&#039;s official title is &#039;Director of Basketball Operations.&#039; That&#039;s a pretty common position in most front offices, to the best of my knowledge.

And no, I absolutely did not compare Knight to those guys. Those are the guys he should be watching, but his game is nowhere near similar to them. He doesn&#039;t pass well, he turns it over too much and he doesn&#039;t use his body to draw contact. Those are all things that those three do exceedingly well and things that Knight has not shown a knack for in college for a pro. My point is the exact opposite of what you just said, actually -- that despite being a big, less athletic PG, Knight is NOT really comparable to other big, less athletic PGs yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catanella&#8217;s official title is &#8216;Director of Basketball Operations.&#8217; That&#8217;s a pretty common position in most front offices, to the best of my knowledge.</p>
<p>And no, I absolutely did not compare Knight to those guys. Those are the guys he should be watching, but his game is nowhere near similar to them. He doesn&#8217;t pass well, he turns it over too much and he doesn&#8217;t use his body to draw contact. Those are all things that those three do exceedingly well and things that Knight has not shown a knack for in college for a pro. My point is the exact opposite of what you just said, actually &#8212; that despite being a big, less athletic PG, Knight is NOT really comparable to other big, less athletic PGs yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bugsygod</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/07/dennis-rodman-is-now-an-author-of-a-childrens-book/comment-page-1/#comment-80812</link>
		<dc:creator>bugsygod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=10705#comment-80812</guid>
		<description>My apolgy on the hiring of cantenalla, i missed that article by you guys.  But my question remains, they added a position right?!?  So even losing Perry they were not &quot;losing&quot; a position from prior years, just maintaining same level, but now with this addition to the front office, they are OVER prior staffing, correct?
its also funny to because you just made a knight comparison to sturdy bigger less athletic pgs, like billups, miller and deron.  I do the same thing and im crazy.  smh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apolgy on the hiring of cantenalla, i missed that article by you guys.  But my question remains, they added a position right?!?  So even losing Perry they were not &#8220;losing&#8221; a position from prior years, just maintaining same level, but now with this addition to the front office, they are OVER prior staffing, correct?<br />
its also funny to because you just made a knight comparison to sturdy bigger less athletic pgs, like billups, miller and deron.  I do the same thing and im crazy.  smh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/07/dennis-rodman-is-now-an-author-of-a-childrens-book/comment-page-1/#comment-80811</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=10705#comment-80811</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;He stated &#039;they need 16 roster spots&#039; meaning that they have 16 players they&#039;d like to have on their roster. He didn&#039;t say meaning that he thinks the league allows them to have 16 spots.

And as far as filling every roster spot, I&#039;m actually OK with leaving a spot open if it is truly done to have some flexibility to add more players than you send out in a trade or to use it as a spot to audition D-League players on 10-day contracts at some point during the season. The Pistons, however, left a spot open so that they didn&#039;t have to pay a salary. It was cost-saving. Honestly, I&#039;m OK with that too. I understand why a team, especially an expensive team with bad attendance like the Pistons were last year, would look for ways to save some money. I just resent the fact that me making that statement, to you, means I&#039;m calling the owner &#039;cheap.&#039;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He stated &#8216;they need 16 roster spots&#8217; meaning that they have 16 players they&#8217;d like to have on their roster. He didn&#8217;t say meaning that he thinks the league allows them to have 16 spots.</p>
<p>And as far as filling every roster spot, I&#8217;m actually OK with leaving a spot open if it is truly done to have some flexibility to add more players than you send out in a trade or to use it as a spot to audition D-League players on 10-day contracts at some point during the season. The Pistons, however, left a spot open so that they didn&#8217;t have to pay a salary. It was cost-saving. Honestly, I&#8217;m OK with that too. I understand why a team, especially an expensive team with bad attendance like the Pistons were last year, would look for ways to save some money. I just resent the fact that me making that statement, to you, means I&#8217;m calling the owner &#8216;cheap.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/07/dennis-rodman-is-now-an-author-of-a-childrens-book/comment-page-1/#comment-80810</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=10705#comment-80810</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot; If you notice when i take exception with your articles etc, is when you guys make conclusions, with out fact or research.&quot;

No one made a conclusion about anything. The position remained open and they shuffled the titles/responsibilities of others.

Do you know what industry Gores made his fortune in? Private equity. I&#039;m certainly no business expert, but do you know what many private equity firms do? They buy things, then they sell off assets or eliminate staff positions in order to increase profits. Do I think Gores bought the Pistons to do that? No. But I (and I assume Dan as well) also wanted to see clear evidence that they were not eliminating a position before making a judgement one way or the other. Gores has little track record as the owner of a pro sports team, and based on his business background, it was definitely a fair question to ask about whether or not they were going to fill that position.

&quot; His CONSISTENT statements that he will be engaged and spend money as long as it provides value.&quot;

I don&#039;t care about statements. I care about actions. This action, hiring a position, tells me more positive things about Gores than the dozens of P.R. statements he&#039;s made.

&quot;you nor Dan have spoken about the front office adding ken cantenalla from the nba league office.&quot;

 Yeah, we&#039;ve totally never mentioned the team hiring Catanella. Except for the post we wrote about it:

&lt;a href=&quot;../../../2011/12/pistons-name-ken-catanella-as-director-of-basketball-operations/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/12/pistons-name-ken-catanella-as-director-of-basketball-operations/&lt;/a&gt; 

I await your apology for your false conclusion.

&quot;Lastly the reason it seems its me against you guys is because I AM A DETROIT PISTONS FAN!&quot;

So are, I assume, most or all of the readers of this site. But they don&#039;t act like you act in the comments. Even when people disagree with us, they don&#039;t act like you.

&quot;You guys write articles CONSISTENLY AGAINST the pistsons.&quot;

The Pistons have been a bad team for three years. Writing that they&#039;ve been a bad team is not &#039;against the Pistons.&#039; It is a fact. If I was sitting here writing how excellent everything is and how great it has been to be a fan of this franchise the last three years and how every bad move the organization has made is totally justifiable, you know what would happen? No one would read this site because I would have no credibility. I express my opinions. I do it in an honest way. I&#039;m not always right, but do you know why people read this site? It&#039;s because Dan and I do our best to be honest in our analysis. That doesn&#039;t mean people always agree with us, that doesn&#039;t mean we&#039;re smarter than anyone else, it just means we&#039;re an independent source that covers the team and offers insight that, I think, some people like to read. And honestly, if you don&#039;t like how we write, if you don&#039;t think we&#039;re fair, you are 100 percent entitled to that opinion. It&#039;s the way you go about expressing that opinion that drives me up a wall. You are rude, you miss the point often and when it is pointed out to you that you missed the point, you only become ruder and more intolerable.

&quot;I mention a comparison of him to chauncey billups (which many others have made the same) and you spend the rest of the day ripping knight?&quot;
I wasn&#039;t ripping Knight. I was ripping your opinion.

&quot;You dont make comparisons but most human beings do, I ask you to compare knight to ANYONE, your response??&quot;

There is no player I can honestly compare Knight to right now. There is no one his game resembles to me. He often tries to pull off moves that players like Derrick Rose and John Wall make, but he&#039;s not very successful with that b/c he&#039;s nowhere near the athlete those guys are. I wish he&#039;d study bigger, less athletic PGs like Billups, Andre Miller or Deron Williams, because his body type and athletic ability are similar. But game-wise? He doesn&#039;t really play like any of those guys yet. He hasn&#039;t shown an ability to draw contact. He hasn&#039;t shown an ability to be a low turnover PG. He hasn&#039;t shown an ability to run a halfcourt offense or be a high-assist PG yet. That&#039;s not me knocking Knight either. I just don&#039;t think there&#039;s he&#039;s shown much of anything as a pro yet except for an ability to be a good spot up shooter.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220; If you notice when i take exception with your articles etc, is when you guys make conclusions, with out fact or research.&#8221;</p>
<p>No one made a conclusion about anything. The position remained open and they shuffled the titles/responsibilities of others.</p>
<p>Do you know what industry Gores made his fortune in? Private equity. I&#8217;m certainly no business expert, but do you know what many private equity firms do? They buy things, then they sell off assets or eliminate staff positions in order to increase profits. Do I think Gores bought the Pistons to do that? No. But I (and I assume Dan as well) also wanted to see clear evidence that they were not eliminating a position before making a judgement one way or the other. Gores has little track record as the owner of a pro sports team, and based on his business background, it was definitely a fair question to ask about whether or not they were going to fill that position.</p>
<p>&#8220; His CONSISTENT statements that he will be engaged and spend money as long as it provides value.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care about statements. I care about actions. This action, hiring a position, tells me more positive things about Gores than the dozens of P.R. statements he&#8217;s made.</p>
<p>&#8220;you nor Dan have spoken about the front office adding ken cantenalla from the nba league office.&#8221;</p>
<p> Yeah, we&#8217;ve totally never mentioned the team hiring Catanella. Except for the post we wrote about it:</p>
<p><a href="../../../2011/12/pistons-name-ken-catanella-as-director-of-basketball-operations/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/12/pistons-name-ken-catanella-as-director-of-basketball-operations/</a> </p>
<p>I await your apology for your false conclusion.</p>
<p>&#8220;Lastly the reason it seems its me against you guys is because I AM A DETROIT PISTONS FAN!&#8221;</p>
<p>So are, I assume, most or all of the readers of this site. But they don&#8217;t act like you act in the comments. Even when people disagree with us, they don&#8217;t act like you.</p>
<p>&#8220;You guys write articles CONSISTENLY AGAINST the pistsons.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Pistons have been a bad team for three years. Writing that they&#8217;ve been a bad team is not &#8216;against the Pistons.&#8217; It is a fact. If I was sitting here writing how excellent everything is and how great it has been to be a fan of this franchise the last three years and how every bad move the organization has made is totally justifiable, you know what would happen? No one would read this site because I would have no credibility. I express my opinions. I do it in an honest way. I&#8217;m not always right, but do you know why people read this site? It&#8217;s because Dan and I do our best to be honest in our analysis. That doesn&#8217;t mean people always agree with us, that doesn&#8217;t mean we&#8217;re smarter than anyone else, it just means we&#8217;re an independent source that covers the team and offers insight that, I think, some people like to read. And honestly, if you don&#8217;t like how we write, if you don&#8217;t think we&#8217;re fair, you are 100 percent entitled to that opinion. It&#8217;s the way you go about expressing that opinion that drives me up a wall. You are rude, you miss the point often and when it is pointed out to you that you missed the point, you only become ruder and more intolerable.</p>
<p>&#8220;I mention a comparison of him to chauncey billups (which many others have made the same) and you spend the rest of the day ripping knight?&#8221;<br />
I wasn&#8217;t ripping Knight. I was ripping your opinion.</p>
<p>&#8220;You dont make comparisons but most human beings do, I ask you to compare knight to ANYONE, your response??&#8221;</p>
<p>There is no player I can honestly compare Knight to right now. There is no one his game resembles to me. He often tries to pull off moves that players like Derrick Rose and John Wall make, but he&#8217;s not very successful with that b/c he&#8217;s nowhere near the athlete those guys are. I wish he&#8217;d study bigger, less athletic PGs like Billups, Andre Miller or Deron Williams, because his body type and athletic ability are similar. But game-wise? He doesn&#8217;t really play like any of those guys yet. He hasn&#8217;t shown an ability to draw contact. He hasn&#8217;t shown an ability to be a low turnover PG. He hasn&#8217;t shown an ability to run a halfcourt offense or be a high-assist PG yet. That&#8217;s not me knocking Knight either. I just don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s he&#8217;s shown much of anything as a pro yet except for an ability to be a good spot up shooter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bugsygod</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/07/dennis-rodman-is-now-an-author-of-a-childrens-book/comment-page-1/#comment-80808</link>
		<dc:creator>bugsygod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=10705#comment-80808</guid>
		<description>But Patrick you dont rip this guy for not knowing the rules???  He clearly states they need 16 roster spots in his orginal comment.. hello??!!??  He also makes a argument against your idea of filling every roster spot, to send guys to the d league for development, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Patrick you dont rip this guy for not knowing the rules???  He clearly states they need 16 roster spots in his orginal comment.. hello??!!??  He also makes a argument against your idea of filling every roster spot, to send guys to the d league for development, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bugsygod</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/07/dennis-rodman-is-now-an-author-of-a-childrens-book/comment-page-1/#comment-80807</link>
		<dc:creator>bugsygod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=10705#comment-80807</guid>
		<description>As i have stated before i think this site HAS GREAT PISTONS CONTENT!  Tons of information and you pull from many different sites.  I am CLEARLY not the smartest in the roof.  If you notice when i take exception with your articles etc, is when you guys make conclusions, with out fact or research.  In this argument about Gores and if he is cheap or will spend money.  We can only go by what he is doing as Pistons owner!  In my argument that he is NOT cheap, i mentioned the many improvements he is making to the team.  His CONSISTENT statements that he will be engaged and spend money as long as it provides value.   You and Dan said you were looking for &quot;clues&quot; if he will be cheap owner or not.  I mentioned the palace improvements, the millions spend on the players lockerroom, technology upgrades to the palace and pistons.com.  You said you would rather see him invest in &quot;the team&quot; as the palace upgrades will benefit PS&amp;E as well as the team.  When FA&#039;s look at the owner spending to improve player facilities that IS a way to help the team directly!  This of course will not be the only reason for a potential FA to come to detroit, but it does help.  With you guys access to the detroit newspaper beat writers, official pistons espn blog site, i would think you guys could just pick a phone an ask if they are hiring or replacing positions.
You keep mentioning that the pistons were downgrading by not replacing this position, but you nor Dan have spoken about the front office adding ken cantenalla from the nba league office.  This is a positon they ADDED to the front office while Scott Perry was still there. Just another example/clue that Gores is spending money on the TEAM directly.
Lastly the reason it seems its me against you guys is because I AM A DETROIT PISTONS FAN!  You guys write articles CONSISTENLY AGAINST the pistsons.   ex.  EVERYONE said after Anthony Davis the guy we would love to get our hands on would be Drummond, but the first article on pistonspowered after the draft....Pistons get there man Drummond, but he will probably be a bust.  I mean really???  smh.  You write a big article about Knights maturity and how this is so great and shows in everything he does.  I mention a comparison of him to chauncey billups (which many others have made the same) and you spend the rest of the day ripping knight?!  You dont make comparisons but most human beings do, I ask you to compare knight to ANYONE, your response??
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As i have stated before i think this site HAS GREAT PISTONS CONTENT!  Tons of information and you pull from many different sites.  I am CLEARLY not the smartest in the roof.  If you notice when i take exception with your articles etc, is when you guys make conclusions, with out fact or research.  In this argument about Gores and if he is cheap or will spend money.  We can only go by what he is doing as Pistons owner!  In my argument that he is NOT cheap, i mentioned the many improvements he is making to the team.  His CONSISTENT statements that he will be engaged and spend money as long as it provides value.   You and Dan said you were looking for &#8220;clues&#8221; if he will be cheap owner or not.  I mentioned the palace improvements, the millions spend on the players lockerroom, technology upgrades to the palace and pistons.com.  You said you would rather see him invest in &#8220;the team&#8221; as the palace upgrades will benefit PS&amp;E as well as the team.  When FA&#8217;s look at the owner spending to improve player facilities that IS a way to help the team directly!  This of course will not be the only reason for a potential FA to come to detroit, but it does help.  With you guys access to the detroit newspaper beat writers, official pistons espn blog site, i would think you guys could just pick a phone an ask if they are hiring or replacing positions.<br />
You keep mentioning that the pistons were downgrading by not replacing this position, but you nor Dan have spoken about the front office adding ken cantenalla from the nba league office.  This is a positon they ADDED to the front office while Scott Perry was still there. Just another example/clue that Gores is spending money on the TEAM directly.<br />
Lastly the reason it seems its me against you guys is because I AM A DETROIT PISTONS FAN!  You guys write articles CONSISTENLY AGAINST the pistsons.   ex.  EVERYONE said after Anthony Davis the guy we would love to get our hands on would be Drummond, but the first article on pistonspowered after the draft&#8230;.Pistons get there man Drummond, but he will probably be a bust.  I mean really???  smh.  You write a big article about Knights maturity and how this is so great and shows in everything he does.  I mention a comparison of him to chauncey billups (which many others have made the same) and you spend the rest of the day ripping knight?!  You dont make comparisons but most human beings do, I ask you to compare knight to ANYONE, your response??<br />
 <br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
