Meyers Leonard’s ceiling apparently the Pistons at No. 9
Leonard’s name was especially hot all weekend. His size (he measured as the tallest guy at camp), athletic ability, his soft shooting touch around the basket and his excellent interviews all positioned him to move from the mid-first round into the lottery. All year, teams feared that Leonard didn’t have the skill or the mental makeup to be a lottery pick. By Friday, virtually every exec in the NBA was predicting that he would go somewhere between 9 and 14 and that he had moved ahead of Tyler Zeller on their big boards.
Posted in Notes • 61 Comments
Leave a Reply






Jun 11, 2012 • 3:54 pm
by Tiko
I’d take Leonard at 9 then trade for Okafor without the 10th pick. Something like Max, Bynum, and Daye should work. Okafor can fill in til Leonard is ready
Jun 11, 2012 • 4:08 pm
by sop
Disagree. Leonard has upside and Okafor will only decompose in the coming years. Plus Okafor is owed a lot of money and Leonard would be cheap for the 1st 5 years.
Jun 11, 2012 • 7:27 pm
by Eric
He didn’t say trade Leonoard for Okafor. But I don’t even want Leonard so w.e.
Jun 11, 2012 • 4:23 pm
by Biff Tannen
Okafor? Who on earth is still interested with his bloated corpse?
Detroit can use help at every position. I don’t care who they draft, as long as they can play at a high level. Royce White is another guy that could go high than expected.
Jun 11, 2012 • 4:24 pm
by Corey
The measurement info from the camp just made me more sure Leonard will be the pistons best option. At this point I just hope he’s still there at 9. He can grow into a starting quality player. We aren’t contending next year regardless, and he’ll still be better than what we’d otherwise have next to Moose anyway.
Jun 11, 2012 • 7:29 pm
by Eric
There’s absolutely no need to “hope” that he’s there at 9. He WILL be there at 9.
Jun 11, 2012 • 4:54 pm
by john
Amnesty Charlie V.
Trade BG for #s 14 and 16 and Parsons
Trade Parsons and both 2nd rounders for Okafor and the no 10 pick
Trade Stuckey and no 9 for the no 3pick
Draft Beal and Zeller, Henson, and Austin Rivers (trade to celtics or keep)
Pg- Knight
Sg- Beal
Sf-prince
Pf- Monroe
C- Zeller
6-Henson
7- jerebko
8- Okafor
9- singler
10- Rivers
Jun 11, 2012 • 5:11 pm
by sop
Young teams like the Pistons don’t pick up high priced immobile veterans. Throughout this off season I will be consistently advocating the Pistons not sign anyone. We’re not going to have much more than the MLE even if CV and Max are gone. Next year is the year to sign players not this one.
Jun 11, 2012 • 5:46 pm
by Worm
You don’t know much about trades do you? You know, as in you can’t trade a guy who has a $13 million contract for a guy on a rookie contract. Even if you could, you think BG is worth two mid-first round draft picks and the Rockets best rookie? You must know something we don’t…
Jun 11, 2012 • 4:55 pm
by john
* okafor and rivers are reversed
Jun 11, 2012 • 5:36 pm
by john
No okafor then.
BG for #s 14,16,Parsons and Dalembert.
Jun 11, 2012 • 5:42 pm
by Jack
Why on earth would Houston even consider doing that trade
Jun 11, 2012 • 5:47 pm
by Worm
Didn’t you see BG light up the Celtics in the playoffs two years ago???? Houston robs us in that trade!!!! /sarcasm
Jun 11, 2012 • 6:42 pm
by Portuguese Piston
Agree. That BG trade is insane…
Jun 11, 2012 • 5:50 pm
by Vic
About time
I love Henson hes going to be a great player but in the same three years it takes for him to put on 30 pounds Leonard could be a top 10 Center.
My favorite lines from Leonard’s interview”I don’t party I don’t drink I don’t go out I really enjoy just working out…”
Jun 11, 2012 • 6:05 pm
by Mark
Agreed. Leonard sounds like another gym rat, tireless worker, committed to getting better every day. That kind of character and work ethic tells me he’d fit in perfect with Knight and Monroe off the court. And I think his game would compliment them great on the court as well.
Monroe’s weaknesses
- Struggles defending huge, strong Centers in the post
- Lacks a consistent mid range jumper
- Lacks athleticism
- Lacks ability to be a rim protector, shot-blocker, and anchor on D
Leonard has the ability to cover for him in all 4 of those areas. There isn’t another big at 9 that I can say that for.
Jun 11, 2012 • 5:55 pm
by john
Nice bench player
Jun 11, 2012 • 5:59 pm
by chubbs
If you think BG would get #14, and 16 you are crazy
Jun 11, 2012 • 6:04 pm
by john
Gives them Depth and its a late lottery pick and a mid 1st round pick! who else would you offer???
Jun 11, 2012 • 6:53 pm
by Coach_Ackley
Dude ur crazy to think Houston will take BG in any deal… Plus Leonard will be more than a bench player with his size and skllset and if he can stay out of trouble ” Hense he will ” then theres noway to to think he cant go to mutiple all-stars….
Jun 11, 2012 • 7:02 pm
by tarsier
You would have to give Houston picks for them to take on BG. And no, it doesn’t give them depth. They would rather play whoever they get with the 14th pick right now than play BG. As would any other team in the league. Also, Houston is nothing but depth. They don’t need more, they need a star.
Jun 11, 2012 • 7:36 pm
by Mark
I would love Leonard at 9. He has compared his game to Joakim Noah and I think thats pretty accurate. Keep in mind hes not contributing next year down the line he would be a perfect compliment to Monroe in the post. He simply has more upside than Zeller or the other options available at 9 (unless Drummond falls). Taking Leonard and possibly signing a big like Jason Thompson would be the best bet.
It makes me laugh when I hear these crazy trade scenarios involving Ben Gordon, Stuckey for the #3. These are trades that have 0 chance of happening. We are stuck with Ben Gordon until the yr before his contract expires and theres no way around that.
Jun 11, 2012 • 7:41 pm
by Mark
I read an article in the freepress highlighting some free agent targets and J Thompson was there. That being said I don’t really know how much cap room we have but he would help.
Jun 11, 2012 • 9:06 pm
by ryan
I would be extremely happy with Meyers Leonard and Jason Thompson this off season. Leonard’s interview just sold me on the only part of his game I worried about (attitude). He’s got the size and athletic ability to be very helpful here. With him and our other young fellas learning and improving we have a good chance to build in manner similar to what OKC”s done (not comparing the talent levels just building through the draft).
Jason Thompson would be the other starting big right now. He’s got a track record of being able to score and rebound reasonably well and should be able to fit in and grow here. Also he’s probably right about the price we can afford.
Aside form some kind of dream scenario where we trade with Houston to get their two picks this Leonard-Thompson would be a good haul. Of course I’d love a trade to dump Ben Gordon’s sorry ass even if we’re only getting a box of athletic tape and some unused flip-flops in return.
Jun 11, 2012 • 9:25 pm
by John
Who else would Houston take? Singler? Bynum?
Singler and 39 for 14 or 16??
Jun 11, 2012 • 9:37 pm
by Worm
Nope, that’s one sided too. They might listen to Brandon Knight and our first of two 2nd round picks for 14 & 16, and that might still be a stretch.
Jun 11, 2012 • 9:47 pm
by Gurman
I’d give our 9 and our 2 second rounders to houston for their 14 and 16. We could get Moultrie and Leonard. That would be a crazy front court of Leonard/Moultrie/Monroe for years to come
Jun 11, 2012 • 10:38 pm
by Nate
Too Risky. Milwaukee picks at 12, and having just traded Andrew Bogut I can’t see them passing on a big. I’d even say that there would be at least a slim chance New Orleans would take him with the 10th pick to pair with Davis. I would hate to trade down to get a player and then have him get taken after your original pick. If you really want him it’s better to take him at 9 than to risk someone else stealing him.
Jun 11, 2012 • 10:04 pm
by John
I’d never give up knight or the pick to trade down. Singler, 39 and 44 for 14?
Jun 11, 2012 • 10:41 pm
by chubbs
Are you 12 years old john? You think 3 2cd rounders is good enough to get the 14th pick. my god
Jun 11, 2012 • 10:59 pm
by Anthony
I love Leonard at 9 the only other person I would take there is Drummond if he falls.
And John…Buddy…Please stop talking. Wtf are they going to do with BG or Singler? The trades do absolutely nothing for them. They’re probably going package one of those picks with Scola and Lowry for Gasol (a good player) not BG or Singler (Garbage)
Jun 11, 2012 • 11:08 pm
by Mark
Leonard is the pick here hands down. It goes without saying that right now the Pistons are clearly lacking a shot blocking defensive presence in the post, which is why it seems John Henson seems to be the popular pick according to analysts at the moment. But down the line Leonard could easily fill all these needs and I think he has much more upside. I would rather have the true 7 footer. And although the interview process does little in my eyes to measure a guy’s character, you gotta love the quote that Vic provided in the post above. I love hearing that stuff. There are questions about his attitude but I think that stuff is overblown. He sulked a bit last year but the Illini were a mess. He was underutilized all year while their guards were chucking fade away 3s all season. He looked impressive when I watched him play and when given the opportunity, which wasnt often, he was efficient down low and got the better of a lot of the talented bigs in the big 10. Obviously hes still a work in progress but I think we to grab him at 9 if hes there. It will pay big dividends down the line.
Jun 11, 2012 • 11:25 pm
by John
The lakers already have Ramon sessions. What would they do with him?
It’s a late lottery pick and Singler is a developable prospect.
What else could they want for #14? Chris Paul?!?? It’s not the no. 1 pick
Jun 11, 2012 • 11:27 pm
by Mark
Yeah unfortunately BG isnt going anywhere. The Pistons would be stupid to trade Knight and they arnt trading Stuckey. Knight showed he has flaws but hes 19 and his intangibles are off the charts. Hes going to max out his potential, whatever that actually is remains to be seen but hes gonna put in the work to improve next year. I think we see a different player come fall. Stuckey was arguably our best player. After watching him this year does anyone here hate the deal he signed? He showed leadership, played solid D, and made a lot of clutch plays over the course of the year.
We dont need to make any trades. We have a good young core and the team noticeably improved after a terrible 4-20 start. Dumars has the chance to add balance to the guard-heavy roster we’ve been accustomed to the past couple years. We’re all talking about the 9 but we have 2 2nd rounders also to add size (Nicholson, Drew Gordon, Ezeli maybe). Given Dumars track record of finding 2nd round talent this cant be overlooked. I like where this team is headed and can’t wait to see what we do in a few weeks.
Jun 12, 2012 • 1:44 am
by Reaction
I agree Stuckey is good and all but if you think about it the Pistons are at LEAST 3-4 years from championship contention and Stuckey is already 26 which would mean he will be around 30 by the time IF everything works out correctly (draft right, make moves etc). If the Pistons are saying that they are rebuilding and going young then given the ages of the new pieces they have Knight Monroe Jerebko etc, I think they should use Stuckey as really good trade bait for high up picks since he had an amazing break out season this season. :)
Jun 11, 2012 • 11:44 pm
by Tee Woods
Fab Melo Hello perfect fit rim protector hey big ben didnt score but he didnt let you score either we need fab baby put monroe back to pf get rid of bg and tay i love tay but i think he has out grown this team
Jun 12, 2012 • 2:12 am
by DG
I like Leonard. I think he fits better than either Henson or PJ III. I’d like to see the Pistons consider O’Quinn and/or Machado in the second round. O’Quinn has great measurables, which should be enough to make him a decent backup and really bulk up the front line. I’d love to see him and Leonard fight for the starting job in practice.
If Machado is still available I think he’d add a dimension to the guards that the Pistons don’t have.
Jun 12, 2012 • 5:20 am
by Marvin Jones
Hey, I’ve been saying Leonard since the season ended, I watched him in college and was impressed. I’ve been gettng the beat down from the moderators and certain posters for touting Leonard but I think he’s our best bet at 9
Jun 12, 2012 • 8:48 am
by John
Yes, Stuckey did have a good season but like one guy said up there, he’d be good trade bait. AlsO, cleveland is shopping their pick according to the rumor mill,
Jun 12, 2012 • 9:46 am
by Corey
The problem with trading Stuckey is that we’d have to trade him for another guy who can okay point guard for substantial minutes, because BG can’t at all. Knight can’t be the only guy who can play point- and he needs to improve at it a lot as it is. So who can we trade Stuckey for that will improve the team? Maybe if we could get another lottery pij and get Marshall. But could we be really confident that would be an improvement?
I think losing stuck would make the team too young, actually. Give Stuckey one more year and find out if he improves more, or can be consistently good all year. If not, he’s then a good player on a reasonable one year contract, and is trade value gold.
Jun 12, 2012 • 10:47 am
by rick
This will be nothing more than the American version of Darko. Im amazed at all the posters clamoring for this guy when in fact it sounds similar to the way they talked about Darko 9 years ago. The only difference here is that this kid is from the states and everyone is familiar with his College. If this was the same kind of evaluation for a foreign kid nobody in here would trust because of the Darko situation. Now because everyone around here has seen him and knows a bit about him everyone assumes they have an eye for talent and instantly he is pegged as someone who will be solid based off what? Well I’m not falling for the banana in the tail pipe and going all crazy over a second yr player who just doesnt ooze with talent anymore than Darko did when it was time to draft him back in 03. Tell me I’m wrong and it doesnt have that same feeling and if not then some ar ein denial and actually believing that he will be some savior four years down the road. If he can’t come in and play right away why are we stashing him on the bench and not allowing him to grow with the other players he will eventually be playing with? It makes no sense to me, and if anyone wants to say its sour grapes read some old articles from his days at Illinois. These articles that I’ve seen reek of Darko. This guy walks onto campus and assumes minutes are suppose to be given to him simply because he is 7’0 tall and after a summer of playing U.S Basketball under 19 team. Sounds like a certain seven footer to me that used to play here. I just don’t want a guy that everyone will be crying about in three four years did not reach his potential. Austin Daye, who only did two years at college just as Leonard, is trash in most peoples opinion and everyone wants him gone can we all agree on that. Why then is it ok for the team to wait on Leonard to develop even though we will be devoid big men just as we are good wings? He needs to play and if he is even decent why not learn how to get better in the same way people expected for Daye by playing against the best? All Im saying is look at it objectively and say to yourself ” Would I want this guy if he was playing on some team in Europe”? If this was a European prospect and the analysts had him pegged for Detroit I really think most on this board would be up in arms and calling for Joe D’s job. Maybe I am wrong but it is my opinion that Detroit draft players that can play right away just as their last two first rounders. No reason to start stashing players like you’re a title team waiting for them to develop. Also who has the crystal ball that says Detroit is not in cntention to do anything? The playoffs have always been about matchups, injuries, coaching, and how the referees are calling it. It would be disengenuous to say Detroit isn’t ready because who knew two years ago OKC would be in the Finals? Now rI’m not saying Detroit is destined for the Finals, but I am sure not going to degrade my team in hopes of them drafting a player who we think might fit over someone who may be able to contribute right away and put everyone’s favorite team(Detroit) that much closer to a Finals appearance.
Jun 12, 2012 • 11:15 am
by Aruna
Very good points Rick. The main difference here is that we’re not picking him at #2 over commodities like Carmelo Anthony and Chris Bosh. We’d be taking him at #9. I don’t think the Knicks would have been unhappy with Darko over Michael Sweetney or the Wizards over Jarvis Hayes. Maybe the Warriors would have issue with losing out on Pietrus, or the SuperSonics on Collison. The only players picked after 9 that made a major impact on the league were David West, Kendrick Perkins, Leandro Barbosa, Josh Howard and Mo Williams and West wasn’t picked until 18, Perkins 27, Barbosa 28, Howard 29, and Williams nor until the second round.
The more apt comparison to the Darko situation would be taking Drummond second over Robinson or MKG. So I do believe GMs have learned, since there is considerable talk of him dropping to . At the same time, if Drummond falls to 9 I would gladly snap him up too. I think Leonard is probably worth the risk at 9, Henson is a safer bet but that’s like taking Collison over Darko and I’m going to go with upside on that one.
Jun 12, 2012 • 1:54 pm
by Marvin Jones
Well Rick who says he’s going to be “stashed” on the bench other than you. I suspect that just like Knight he would start by backing up Monroe at center and by around the 25 to 30 game mark he would move into the starting line up with Monroe at the PF spot, and why do you keep trying to compare Leonard to somebody, anybody, that has failed in the past. First it was Montross, then Darko and now Daye, just leave it alone dude, he’s not any of those guys, he’s Meyers Leonard and only he can determine how good he can be by his own dedication and work ethic. He has all the physical tools to be an All Star all he has to do is want it and that’s what Joe has to decide, does he have the head and the heart to be great. What Montross or Darko or Daye have done has absolutely NOTHING to do with Leonard.
Jun 13, 2012 • 11:20 am
by oats
I keep defending Leonard… Strange. Anyways, another difference is easy to explain. Leonard has shown signs of development from last year. As a freshman he barely played and wasn’t very effective. While far from a star player, this year he got play time and had huge jumps in productivity. Those jumps came not only in totals, but in per minute stats as well, which suggests that he actually did get better. I know per minute stats for the 8 minutes a game he played as a freshman don’t really say anything conclusive, but when coupled with the fact that he earned the minutes this year it becomes reasonably safe to say Leonard is showing signs of improvement. That is an important thing to know about a project guy, that he is in fact making positive strides. Darko, meanwhile, was still consistently being buried on the bench in Europe. We had very few opportunities to see him. It was impossible to determine if he was actually good, none the less if he was improving. I do think that makes Leonard a better risk than Darko. That’s especially true when you consider, as has already been pointed out, the relative strength of the draft at 9 this year and at 2 that year.
I should also acknowledge that your point about foreigners is mostly spot on. I do trust them less because I’ve not had an opportunity to judge them for myself. What’s more, Euro league doesn’t use rotations like we do in the states. They often spread their minutes out way more than we do. I also have no ability to know how good the strength of any given league is in Europe, I just don’t pay enough attention to them. As a result, I can’t even come to opinions from their stats. I don’t know what Euro Leonard would look like as a prospect because you also have to account for all the different leagues. He probably wouldn’t have been at a top notch league in what was his freshman year, so I’d look for him to make the jump up to a better club in year 2. He’d also have done more against worse competition in that weaker league, so I’d be looking for him to remain mostly consistent while transitioning to higher level talent. Anyways, the end result is that Euro Meyers Leonard has a very different profile than American Meyers Leonard. I don’t know exactly what the Euro version of him would look like, but I’d definitely have less faith in him since it would require I lean more on scouting reports and less on my own opinion of him. I think that’s a natural reaction though. All of that said, I don’t dismiss every Euro. I loved Valanciunas and Biyombo last year. I still like those guys much more than Leonard this year too. I suspect that I’d see him more or less the same way, a huge gamble that I can understand the team taking.
Jun 12, 2012 • 11:26 am
by Corey
The difference between Leonard and Darkobis specifically that we’ve seen Leonard play. R had a body of work you can look at. He was actually quite good last year. A 24.0 college PER, over 13 PTs and 8 rebounds per game. Good, but not great. However, it shows he can play. He can shoot free throws and short/medium jump shots. If he did that his freshman year instead of sophomore everyone would say he’s a top five pick. Picking at 9 we need to take the late bloomer if we want a player with all star ability.
The guy who scares me as the next Darko is Andre Drummond. He shot 29% on free throws. 29%! The guy has no basketball skills. He could easily be a bust, especially if he goes to a poor player-development team.
And if not Leonard, who?
Jun 12, 2012 • 11:28 am
by john
Is this any better?
Trade both 2012 2nd and BG for Okafor and the no 10 pick then Amnesty Okafor
Trade Stuckey and no 9 (and 2014 first?)for the no 3 and blatche(they have younger depth at pf)
Trade Jerebko,Singler, and (protected)2013 1 st for #4
Draft Beal,Drummond, and Leonard/Zeller/Henson/PJ3/waiters
Pg- Knight
Sg- Beal
Sf-prince
Pf- Monroe
C- Drummond
6-” Leonard/…”
7- Bynum
8- Wallace???
9- FA
10- Macklin/Daye/FA?
With Eric Gordon possibly on the way out, it gives them a back up plan.
Yes, this does give us a lack of future first rounders but, this is the richest draft since 2003 according to some writers although 2007 and 2008 are close.
Jun 12, 2012 • 1:12 pm
by dvs
You can’t trade for a player and amnesty them.
NOH are wanting to shed salary by adding the pick. They’ll want cap space not another crappy contract like BG.
Why would Wasington give up the 3 only to get back a guy like Stuckey who doesn’t compliment wall?? Blatche can just be amnestied.
jerebko and Singler don’t have that kind of value.
Stop posting trade ideas if you’re not going to consider the other team.
Jun 12, 2012 • 11:53 am
by Aaron
Why would they draft leonard?? The pistons need a big man right now that can block shots rebound and spread the floor for Greg Monroe. I would draft moultrie out Mississippi state at #9 then try to trade both second rounders and maybe Austin Daye to move into the late first round to draft Doron Lamb or Moe Harkless to develop into future starters.
The Team would look like this
PG- Brandon Knight
SG- Rodney Stuckey
SF- Tayshaun Prince
PF- Arnett Moultrie
C- Greg Monroe
6- Ben Gorden
7- Lamb/ Harkless
8- Jason Maxiell
9- Austin Daye
10- Kyle Singler
11- Will Bynum
12- Vernon Macklin
Jun 12, 2012 • 12:05 pm
by john
The whole point of this draft is to get a center. I messed up on the previous post so here’s the corrected version:
Trade both 2012 2nd and BG for Okafor and the no 10 pick then Amnesty Okafor
Trade Stuckey and no 9 (and 2014 first?)for the no 3 and blatche(they have younger depth at pf)
Trade Jerebko,Singler, and (protected)2013 1 st for #4
Draft Beal,Drummond, and Leonard/Zeller/Henson/PJ3/waiters
Pg- Knight
Sg- Beal
Sf-prince
Pf- Monroe
C- Drummond
6-” Leonard/…”
7- Blatche
8.Bynum
9 Wallace???
10- Macklin/Daye/FA?
With Eric Gordon possibly on the way out, it gives them a back up plan.
Yes, this does give us a lack of future first rounders but, this is the richest draft since 2003 according to some writers although 2007 and 2008 are close.
Leonard can develop into the sixth man of the future, easily. He’d be a spark off the bench.
Jun 12, 2012 • 1:11 pm
by joe d
John you an idiot stop posting, none of your video game trades would ever go through No wouldnt give us the # 10 pick an okafor for one for 2 if that trade did happen they couldnt amnesty okafor because theycan only amnesty players that they signed before the new cba like gordan or charlie v so jus stop talking
Jun 12, 2012 • 1:21 pm
by john
ok, then keep him! i could care less if it worked or not! i”m not the GM. Its Just a rough sketch. Dont have to amnesty him. They NEED depth at SG since Gordon is an RFA!!!! The only longshot trade out there is the Jerebko trade
Jun 13, 2012 • 6:10 am
by tarsier
The Okafor trade is a mega long shot. You seriously underestimate Ben Gordon’s negative value. And apparently how much more valuable the number 10 pick is than 2nd rounders.
You also apparently undervalue Stuckey since you even consider throwing yet another 1st rounder in there.
And BG is not a backup plan for EG. Eric Gordon is staying in NO if hey want him. And nobody wants BG. Listen, you’d have to additionally incentivize someone to take BG for nothing.
Jun 12, 2012 • 1:51 pm
by Nick
From looking at the draft combine this weekend I wouldn’t be surprised if Drummond fell down to us at #9. I don’t think he will go top 5, so it depends on how much Portland like the Lillard kid at #6. They are in a good situation with 2 lottery picks and they can get a more polished big at #11. If Portland dont pick Drummond at #6 I believe he will fall to Detroit at #9.
Jun 12, 2012 • 2:00 pm
by joe d
All you trade ideas are long shot trades none of them have a chance at happening they will keep grodan because he is a RFA they r gonna match any offer and pair him with anthony davis then they will draft another big at 10 have a a young core to build on they arent gonna trade for bg
Jun 12, 2012 • 9:50 pm
by Lorenzo
Lol, I swear some of these trade scenarios would have trouble going through in video games let alone in real life. In my *Yoda voice*….”strong is this delusion.”
Jun 13, 2012 • 12:43 am
by Tim Creamo
Yikes. Wait it out, guys… Emeka? Not worth the speculation.
Jun 13, 2012 • 3:11 am
by Jeremy
DraftExpress just released a scouting video report for Leonard. Worth watching. I like Leonard, but my main concern is that his stats are too similar to those of Cole Aldrich (except Aldrich was a far better blocker in college). Piston fans were once excited about the prospect of drafting that guy and he’s been a non factor in his NBA career so far.
At the end of the day this is all speculation. I hope the Joe D will bring in all these guys (Leonard, Zeller, Henson, Melo and um… Sullinger) to practice one day and have them go head to head. Though even this type of assessment has its flaws, it can provide the best indication of who can bring to the Pistons what they need.
Jun 13, 2012 • 11:52 am
by Corey
I still like Leonard, but Moultrie’s combine athletic numbers are stellar. I don’t think I’ll cry if they take him either. Henson scored fairly poorly, except for his extreme length (highest standing reach at the combine- 9’4″). But he jumps almost as poorly as Moose.
Jun 13, 2012 • 12:13 pm
by oats
I have mixed feelings about this. I’m not sold on Leonard, at all, even if my comments lately make me look like I’m on the Leonard bandwagon. He’s my 10th favorite prospect in a draft we are selecting 9th in, so I wouldn’t be thrilled with getting him. I understand why he’s not a terrible gamble. He’s a big man, he is athletic, and he has shown signs of improvement. He’s a center, which I think is the hardest position to fill in basketball. He’s also a solid free throw shooter, which suggests he will develop a jump shot in time. Most importantly, he is farthest along as a defender, and the Pistons desperately need a competent post defender. Despite all that, he doesn’t rebound well. Maybe he learns how to do it, but I’m not confident of it. Big men who don’t rebound are scary. Poor rebounding teams often struggle against good competition, and if your starting center isn’t a good rebounder it becomes hard for that to be a strong point for your team. He could develop on the glass, but I really would rather not count on him doing something he hasn’t shown the ability to do all that effectively. I like him enough that I wouldn’t be upset with the pick, but I really wouldn’t feel good about it either.
Jun 13, 2012 • 1:06 pm
by Marvin Jones
Monroe wasn’t a great rebounder in college either, so I wouldn’t hold that against Leonard. Once he gets to the pros I think he’ll rebound better.
Jun 13, 2012 • 6:35 pm
by oats
This is maybe half true. Monroe was a reasonably average rebounder in the college game, but decidedly better than Leonard. Monroe was actually a very good defensive rebounder, and only kind of poor on the offensive boards. The thing was, Georgetown’s offense had Monroe in pretty terrible position to get offensive boards. He was often in the high post in order to help run the offense, and he wouldn’t have much time to get better positioning before a shot would go up. He went pro, and with facilitator responsibilities largely taken away from him, Monroe moved closer to the basket. This allowed him to bolster his offensive rebounding numbers and turned him into a rebounding machine. In both years as a pro, Monroe pulled in a full 2 more offensive rebounds as a pro than he was doing in college. All of this was a totally natural transition for a guy based on his role changing to fit his new offense.
Meyers Leonard is in a different situation. He isn’t asked to play in the high post, or to help facilitate for his team. He actually is placed in a position to work for offensive rebounds. Despite that, he doesn’t do it any better than how Monroe did in college. As the fact that he is a worse rebounder would indicate, he is a worse defensive rebounder than Monroe. So while Monroe only needed to improve on offensive boards to become good, Leonard needs to improve on all aspects of rebounding to be good. He’s big, and athletic, and he is a shot blocker, so there is reason to think he can develop the skill. That is still very different from Monroe who already had the skill and just needed a role change to allow him to display it. I’m just not convinced Leonard will be effective on the glass at the next level considering he isn’t better at it while at a school like Illinois that really needed him to be good at it. Throw in how raw his game is all around to my concerns about his rebounding, and I’m just not buying Leonard as one of the 9 best players for the Pistons.