Comments on: John Henson to the Pistons becoming vogue in mock drafts

By: MrCarter

MrCarter — Mon, 04 Jun 2012 05:02:50 +0000

I’ve been leaning towards Henson for a couple months now. Perfect fit for us!!

By: Will

Will — Sat, 02 Jun 2012 06:25:32 +0000

Trade #9 to Houston for #14 and #16. We can draft Arnett Moultrie and Moe Harkless then over John Henson.

By: Chris H

Chris H — Sat, 02 Jun 2012 02:17:43 +0000

I think that comes from people with a nasty streak don’t usually seem to have a lack of confidence. I do think that Leonard is probably the way to go, esp because 7′ and 250+ seem to work fairly well in the NBA. The biggest thing, aside from some sort of mental checks, I’d really look into is his ability to catch and finish. We know we have an excellent passer in Monroe (who will eventually develop a nice 15-18 ft jumper and force people to play him close and closeout hard), so having a guy who can catch and finish right away would be nice.

By: mike

mike — Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:03:44 +0000

I like the idea of trading down to get the rockets 14 and 16 pick. If we do this i bieleve we could get 2 out of these four. zeller, leonard, henson, moultrie. Also if we did that we could try and trade away charlie v to get rid of hes contract. then if the pistons could find a back up shooting guard in the 2nd roud or a free agent they could use the nba amnesty clause on ben gordon to free up alot of cap room.

By: Marvin Jones

Marvin Jones — Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:30:36 +0000

Most of the reports on Leonard say he does have a little nasty in him, so how he “obviously” to you have no mean streak must mean you know him personally. Since I don’t I simply pass on what I’ve read about him.

By: Marvin Jones

Marvin Jones — Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:24:51 +0000

That’s what the mock draft people have been saying, go check some of them out

By: Corey

Corey — Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:05:50 +0000

Leonard won’t be there at the 14th pick. He’s going to climb for sure. I want Leonard because Henson will be good enough to help vs average teams, but always get pushed around by quality size. Leonard will take longer to develop but be a better player- able to physically match or dominate anyone in the league. Henson is a ticket to the mediocrity treadmill.

By: KRIS

KRIS — Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:47:44 +0000

Drummond is most risky pick, as he has not accomplished anything on the college level. Neither team wise, nor individually. I hope he works his way for his own sake, but I also hope his gone by 9. Leonard obviously has no mean streak, while lack of confidence is still big factor for him. He shows some promise though and is tall. Henson suits best skill wise, but is as skinny as it gets. Zeller is most accomplished of those. I wonder where Sullinger goes. So much talk about his limitations, while he was stud on the college level and his footwork and fundamentals are better than much of the NBA big men. Really hard to pick one definitely. I wonder to what extent Pistons front office has its options already prioritized.

By: Jodi Jezz

Jodi Jezz — Fri, 01 Jun 2012 04:57:30 +0000

We need to draft Drummond!!!

By: MrBlockedShot

MrBlockedShot — Thu, 31 May 2012 22:29:59 +0000

Weren’t we going to get a big? Picking Henson doesn’t make much sense then…Please pick Zeller or Leonard, no question. I think we’ll get a good player as well with our second rounder. Most likely a SF/PF.Maybe trading down with Houston is a good idea but I can’t see why would they accept, as apart from Davis, Robinson, MKG and maybe Drummond there’s no big star that can contribute right now and make a team much better (keeping in mind we’re talking about NO, TOR, WAS, etc etc)