<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rodney Stuckey, Tayshaun Prince and Austin Daye all received interest at trade deadline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/03/rodney-stuckey-tayshaun-prince-and-austin-daye-all-received-interest-at-trade-deadline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/03/rodney-stuckey-tayshaun-prince-and-austin-daye-all-received-interest-at-trade-deadline/</link>
	<description>Your Go-To Source For Pistons Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:36:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/03/rodney-stuckey-tayshaun-prince-and-austin-daye-all-received-interest-at-trade-deadline/comment-page-1/#comment-59148</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=9435#comment-59148</guid>
		<description>This is one screwy thread.  Bravo to Patrick for taking up the good fight for sanity.
I&#039;m fed up with Dumars not getting any credit for Monroe and more impatient with how blind some of you are regarding what Monroe means.   He is quickly becoming one of the best centers in the league and he is the opposite of a headcase.  All of this &quot;Dumars has done nothing lately&quot; flat out ignores that he just drafted the best big man the Pistons have drafted in several decades at least.
Dumars reaped Monroe and Knight from two terrible years and he will have a chance to make another pick this year--I for one am not finding this year so terrible as there have been marked improvements.
The frequent comment, &quot;their recent turnaround had more to do with their schedule than anything else&quot; ignores so many things that are evident to anyone watching the games.  Aside from Frank&#039;s positive effect, the growing chemistry between players and the natural progression of Monroe and Knight, Stuckey has simply been playing out of his mind.  Whether he keeps it up is an open question but he has been a different player in the last month and it has been the major reason why they have looked like a much improved team.
@Frankie D.   Dumars may simply differ with you entirely and wish to keep Prince.  I object to the notion that Dumars or any GM is bound to certain generalized prescriptions of how to run a team and there is no obvious rule as in a team should always trade this kind of veteran making this much for so and so.  Dumars may simply value what Prince brings and the issue isn&#039;t ultimately important enough one way or the other to suggest whether Dumars is competent or not.  Your arguments on the issue lack all proportion and let me ask you since I know you follow Portland: How did trading a veteran asset PG in Andre Miller in exchange for a young PG in Raymond Felton work out?  Everyone applauded it but they&#039;d be better right now and Nate would still be the coach if they had kept the veteran in his mid thirties.
@Laser.  I agreed with Webber recently when he said that it was the poorly run franchises that caved in to their fan bases&#039; desires for moves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one screwy thread.  Bravo to Patrick for taking up the good fight for sanity.<br />
I&#8217;m fed up with Dumars not getting any credit for Monroe and more impatient with how blind some of you are regarding what Monroe means.   He is quickly becoming one of the best centers in the league and he is the opposite of a headcase.  All of this &#8220;Dumars has done nothing lately&#8221; flat out ignores that he just drafted the best big man the Pistons have drafted in several decades at least.<br />
Dumars reaped Monroe and Knight from two terrible years and he will have a chance to make another pick this year&#8211;I for one am not finding this year so terrible as there have been marked improvements.<br />
The frequent comment, &#8220;their recent turnaround had more to do with their schedule than anything else&#8221; ignores so many things that are evident to anyone watching the games.  Aside from Frank&#8217;s positive effect, the growing chemistry between players and the natural progression of Monroe and Knight, Stuckey has simply been playing out of his mind.  Whether he keeps it up is an open question but he has been a different player in the last month and it has been the major reason why they have looked like a much improved team.<br />
@Frankie D.   Dumars may simply differ with you entirely and wish to keep Prince.  I object to the notion that Dumars or any GM is bound to certain generalized prescriptions of how to run a team and there is no obvious rule as in a team should always trade this kind of veteran making this much for so and so.  Dumars may simply value what Prince brings and the issue isn&#8217;t ultimately important enough one way or the other to suggest whether Dumars is competent or not.  Your arguments on the issue lack all proportion and let me ask you since I know you follow Portland: How did trading a veteran asset PG in Andre Miller in exchange for a young PG in Raymond Felton work out?  Everyone applauded it but they&#8217;d be better right now and Nate would still be the coach if they had kept the veteran in his mid thirties.<br />
@Laser.  I agreed with Webber recently when he said that it was the poorly run franchises that caved in to their fan bases&#8217; desires for moves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Feldman</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/03/rodney-stuckey-tayshaun-prince-and-austin-daye-all-received-interest-at-trade-deadline/comment-page-1/#comment-59036</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Feldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 04:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=9435#comment-59036</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;If&lt;/em&gt; there were a chance to move Gordon and Villanueva, it was while Dumars&#039; hands were tied. Now, it&#039;s too late. Everyone knows those two can&#039;t play anywhere near what their contracts call for.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>If</em> there were a chance to move Gordon and Villanueva, it was while Dumars&#8217; hands were tied. Now, it&#8217;s too late. Everyone knows those two can&#8217;t play anywhere near what their contracts call for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Feldman</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/03/rodney-stuckey-tayshaun-prince-and-austin-daye-all-received-interest-at-trade-deadline/comment-page-1/#comment-59035</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Feldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 04:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=9435#comment-59035</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If the Blazers are so smart, why did they cut two young players and keep 39-year-old Kurt Thomas?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Blazers are so smart, why did they cut two young players and keep 39-year-old Kurt Thomas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Feldman</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/03/rodney-stuckey-tayshaun-prince-and-austin-daye-all-received-interest-at-trade-deadline/comment-page-1/#comment-59034</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Feldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 04:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=9435#comment-59034</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;what is good is that they didn’t stumble around for years, imagining that they’d be able to muddle through to a mediocre finish.&quot;

Yes, Portland -- first-round exits the last three years and a 41-41 record the year before -- did a great job of not getting stuck being mediocre. 

&quot;but they are obviously being a lot more proactive and aggressive and trying to fix their problems.&quot; 

They&#039;ve definitely been more proactive. The biggest reason: They have better players to work with. 

&quot;and in the meantime joe sits around with his thumb up his behind and continues on in a half-rebuild/half-playoff push that is leading to at least 2-3 more years in the wilderness.&quot;

Hasn&#039;t Dumars pretty clearly said he wouldn&#039;t make a move that helped the team only this season and not in the future? Moves like signing Wilkins don&#039;t necessarily mean the Pistons are selling out for a playoff push. There&#039;s a reasonable case to be made Wilkins will make Daye better in the long run. Will that happen? I have no idea. You don&#039;t either. Is that the better plan than gifting Daye playing time? I don&#039;t know. But it&#039;s a reasonable plan.&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: #dc1728; font-family: &#039;Helvetica Neue&#039;, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;what is good is that they didn’t stumble around for years, imagining that they’d be able to muddle through to a mediocre finish.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, Portland &#8212; first-round exits the last three years and a 41-41 record the year before &#8212; did a great job of not getting stuck being mediocre. </p>
<p>&#8220;but they are obviously being a lot more proactive and aggressive and trying to fix their problems.&#8221; </p>
<p>They&#8217;ve definitely been more proactive. The biggest reason: They have better players to work with. </p>
<p>&#8220;and in the meantime joe sits around with his thumb up his behind and continues on in a half-rebuild/half-playoff push that is leading to at least 2-3 more years in the wilderness.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hasn&#8217;t Dumars pretty clearly said he wouldn&#8217;t make a move that helped the team only this season and not in the future? Moves like signing Wilkins don&#8217;t necessarily mean the Pistons are selling out for a playoff push. There&#8217;s a reasonable case to be made Wilkins will make Daye better in the long run. Will that happen? I have no idea. You don&#8217;t either. Is that the better plan than gifting Daye playing time? I don&#8217;t know. But it&#8217;s a reasonable plan.<span style="background-color: #dc1728; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 20px;"><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Feldman</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/03/rodney-stuckey-tayshaun-prince-and-austin-daye-all-received-interest-at-trade-deadline/comment-page-1/#comment-59029</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Feldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=9435#comment-59029</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Pistons couldn&#039;t have gotten any value for Hamilton. Reportedly, they would have had to give up a first-round pick just so another team would take him.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pistons couldn&#8217;t have gotten any value for Hamilton. Reportedly, they would have had to give up a first-round pick just so another team would take him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Feldman</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/03/rodney-stuckey-tayshaun-prince-and-austin-daye-all-received-interest-at-trade-deadline/comment-page-1/#comment-59025</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Feldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=9435#comment-59025</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Do you really think Daye was definitely drawing better than that?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you really think Daye was definitely drawing better than that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OneBadMutha</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/03/rodney-stuckey-tayshaun-prince-and-austin-daye-all-received-interest-at-trade-deadline/comment-page-1/#comment-59023</link>
		<dc:creator>OneBadMutha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=9435#comment-59023</guid>
		<description>The Nene trade has no relation to anything regarding the Pistons.  With the Nene/McGee trade, you had one team w/ buyers remorse and another team faced w/ either over-paying a guy or losing him for nothing.  They both played the same position.  Both teams made a risky move.  It could go boom or bust for both.
Tay, on the o/ hand, is exactly what he&#039;s always been.  Not great but serviceable.  Living up to his contract.  With his type of game, he&#039;ll probably live up to his contract and continue to be serviceable.  He&#039;s not good enough to trade for a lottery pick or prospect w/ any kind of upside....yet not bad enough or hand-cuffing the organization w/ his contract that it would make sense to just dump him for an expiring.
This idea that you gut your roster of anyone who&#039;s over the age of 24 when rebuilding is idiotic.  It&#039;s videogame franchise mode...but it&#039;s not what you do in real life.  It&#039;s what Washington did...and how is Wall&#039;s process of learning to win coming along?  You need vets to fill the gaps so that guys like Monroe and Knight can have realistic responsibilities and at least compete with a purpose. Let&#039;s not forget that Cliff Robinson, Barry, and Michael Curry were screwing up Detroit&#039;s draft position in their rebuild while Ben Wallace and eventually Chauncy, Rip and Tay would be filtered into a winning team.
If Mike Valenti was brain-washing the local sports fans back then, you all would&#039;ve clamored to have Dumars fired at that time as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nene trade has no relation to anything regarding the Pistons.  With the Nene/McGee trade, you had one team w/ buyers remorse and another team faced w/ either over-paying a guy or losing him for nothing.  They both played the same position.  Both teams made a risky move.  It could go boom or bust for both.<br />
Tay, on the o/ hand, is exactly what he&#8217;s always been.  Not great but serviceable.  Living up to his contract.  With his type of game, he&#8217;ll probably live up to his contract and continue to be serviceable.  He&#8217;s not good enough to trade for a lottery pick or prospect w/ any kind of upside&#8230;.yet not bad enough or hand-cuffing the organization w/ his contract that it would make sense to just dump him for an expiring.<br />
This idea that you gut your roster of anyone who&#8217;s over the age of 24 when rebuilding is idiotic.  It&#8217;s videogame franchise mode&#8230;but it&#8217;s not what you do in real life.  It&#8217;s what Washington did&#8230;and how is Wall&#8217;s process of learning to win coming along?  You need vets to fill the gaps so that guys like Monroe and Knight can have realistic responsibilities and at least compete with a purpose. Let&#8217;s not forget that Cliff Robinson, Barry, and Michael Curry were screwing up Detroit&#8217;s draft position in their rebuild while Ben Wallace and eventually Chauncy, Rip and Tay would be filtered into a winning team.<br />
If Mike Valenti was brain-washing the local sports fans back then, you all would&#8217;ve clamored to have Dumars fired at that time as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/03/rodney-stuckey-tayshaun-prince-and-austin-daye-all-received-interest-at-trade-deadline/comment-page-1/#comment-59003</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 02:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=9435#comment-59003</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I expect this team to legitimately be a playoff team next year, and if they&#039;re not, I&#039;ll probably be ready to move on from the Dumars era.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wrote this in another comment a few weeks ago, and really believe it: the Pistons, along with the Lakers, Spurs, Celtics and Bulls, are the league&#039;s elite, flagship franchises. Those teams have all earned that with their success over the last 30ish years. To me, it&#039;s not acceptable for those teams to miss the playoffs for more than three consecutive years and this will be year three for the Pistons. You just don&#039;t dare go much longer than that when you have a franchise with the history this one has and jeopardize ruining that status.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As far as the blueprint to actually get there, I dunno. Could be a draft pick, a signing after an amnesty and Monroe taking another huge leap forward. Could be a trade. I don&#039;t really care all that much about the how. The result should be continued, sustained improvement and a playoff spot. Short of that, it&#039;s probably time for the team to move on from Dumars.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Like I&#039;ve said, I would&#039;ve loved to see a trade made today. The logical side of me just believes that most likely, there was nothing on the table that would&#039;ve had any benefit except for maybe salary relief at the expense of giving up an asset, and that, to me, is not a positive move.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect this team to legitimately be a playoff team next year, and if they&#8217;re not, I&#8217;ll probably be ready to move on from the Dumars era.</p>
<p>I wrote this in another comment a few weeks ago, and really believe it: the Pistons, along with the Lakers, Spurs, Celtics and Bulls, are the league&#8217;s elite, flagship franchises. Those teams have all earned that with their success over the last 30ish years. To me, it&#8217;s not acceptable for those teams to miss the playoffs for more than three consecutive years and this will be year three for the Pistons. You just don&#8217;t dare go much longer than that when you have a franchise with the history this one has and jeopardize ruining that status.</p>
<p>As far as the blueprint to actually get there, I dunno. Could be a draft pick, a signing after an amnesty and Monroe taking another huge leap forward. Could be a trade. I don&#8217;t really care all that much about the how. The result should be continued, sustained improvement and a playoff spot. Short of that, it&#8217;s probably time for the team to move on from Dumars.</p>
<p>Like I&#8217;ve said, I would&#8217;ve loved to see a trade made today. The logical side of me just believes that most likely, there was nothing on the table that would&#8217;ve had any benefit except for maybe salary relief at the expense of giving up an asset, and that, to me, is not a positive move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Hayes</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/03/rodney-stuckey-tayshaun-prince-and-austin-daye-all-received-interest-at-trade-deadline/comment-page-1/#comment-59000</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=9435#comment-59000</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;last year, dallas wanted to trade for him and joe d declined the offer.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;STRAW MAN STRAW MAN STRAW MAN&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What was or wasn&#039;t offered last year when Prince was playing better and had an expiring deal is IRRELEVANT to this year&#039;s trade deadline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;this year, the local papers reported that joe received calls on prince and he obviously did not trade him.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Right. But what if those calls were to offer shit? Or to say, &quot;We&#039;ll take Prince&#039;s contract if you give us your pick or Knight or Jerebko?&quot; &quot;Offers&quot; or &quot;interest&quot; doesn&#039;t mean there was a market for him. It could mean that people were trying to vulture in and get an asset out of taking on years/money of a contract.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;those are two very specific examples of situations where he did not make trades of some sort that were available.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Uh ... the second example has zero specifics in it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;and what is insane is the idea that casual fans who read papers and/or  websites are supposed to have indepth and detailed knowledge&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Uh ... you don&#039;t have to have in-depth knowledge. But you should at least know something that was offered. Last year, it was reported that Butler/first was offered, so that can easily be judged as bad or good. This year? We just know that &quot;offers&quot; were offered. I don&#039;t think that&#039;s enough info to say it was a failure to pass on it. You can choose the mystery door if you want. I&#039;ll stick with hanging onto Prince into the offseason to see if something better comes along.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;to argue that  fans cannot make logical judgments about available information&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not arguing that fans can&#039;t. Fans can and do. You just aren&#039;t making logical conclusions in these threads today. I&#039;m saying that I can&#039;t logically judge whether Dumars failed by passing on offers if I don&#039;t know whether the offers are shit or not. If a team offered an expiring contract for Prince? Then yes, that was a fail. If a team offered to take Prince for an expiring if the Pistons gave an asset too? Then I would say Dumars made the right decision to pass.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;in fact, i find your dishonest allusion to my not being specific enough hilarious.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I find your need to write thousands of words to say very little and your need to copy and paste everything John Hollinger writes hilarious. But C&#039;est la vie I guess.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;last year, dallas wanted to trade for him and joe d declined the offer.&#8221;</p>
<p>STRAW MAN STRAW MAN STRAW MAN</p>
<p>What was or wasn&#8217;t offered last year when Prince was playing better and had an expiring deal is IRRELEVANT to this year&#8217;s trade deadline.</p>
<p>&#8220;this year, the local papers reported that joe received calls on prince and he obviously did not trade him.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right. But what if those calls were to offer shit? Or to say, &#8220;We&#8217;ll take Prince&#8217;s contract if you give us your pick or Knight or Jerebko?&#8221; &#8220;Offers&#8221; or &#8220;interest&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean there was a market for him. It could mean that people were trying to vulture in and get an asset out of taking on years/money of a contract.</p>
<p>&#8220;those are two very specific examples of situations where he did not make trades of some sort that were available.&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh &#8230; the second example has zero specifics in it.</p>
<p>&#8220;and what is insane is the idea that casual fans who read papers and/or  websites are supposed to have indepth and detailed knowledge&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh &#8230; you don&#8217;t have to have in-depth knowledge. But you should at least know something that was offered. Last year, it was reported that Butler/first was offered, so that can easily be judged as bad or good. This year? We just know that &#8220;offers&#8221; were offered. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s enough info to say it was a failure to pass on it. You can choose the mystery door if you want. I&#8217;ll stick with hanging onto Prince into the offseason to see if something better comes along.</p>
<p>&#8220;to argue that  fans cannot make logical judgments about available information&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not arguing that fans can&#8217;t. Fans can and do. You just aren&#8217;t making logical conclusions in these threads today. I&#8217;m saying that I can&#8217;t logically judge whether Dumars failed by passing on offers if I don&#8217;t know whether the offers are shit or not. If a team offered an expiring contract for Prince? Then yes, that was a fail. If a team offered to take Prince for an expiring if the Pistons gave an asset too? Then I would say Dumars made the right decision to pass.</p>
<p>&#8220;in fact, i find your dishonest allusion to my not being specific enough hilarious.&#8221;</p>
<p>I find your need to write thousands of words to say very little and your need to copy and paste everything John Hollinger writes hilarious. But C&#8217;est la vie I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarsier</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/03/rodney-stuckey-tayshaun-prince-and-austin-daye-all-received-interest-at-trade-deadline/comment-page-1/#comment-58999</link>
		<dc:creator>tarsier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 01:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=9435#comment-58999</guid>
		<description>Absolutely true (last year, Nene would have garnered consideration for second best C). And we gotta expect Nene to bounce back a bit after fully recovering. But I still find top 5 a stretch. Nene cannot be assumed to be quite as good and several other guys have improved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely true (last year, Nene would have garnered consideration for second best C). And we gotta expect Nene to bounce back a bit after fully recovering. But I still find top 5 a stretch. Nene cannot be assumed to be quite as good and several other guys have improved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
