Comments on: 3-on-3: Trading Will Bynum

By: frankie d

frankie d — Sat, 10 Mar 2012 18:32:24 +0000

alas, poor will, we hardly knew ya…
another victim of dumars’ nonsense.
if joe had just left good enough alone, and let his backcourt develop organically, bynum could have established a nice career as an off the bench option. but the moment joe signed gordon and created the logjam at SG, it doomed bynum and this point in his career has been inevitable. too bad, cause he really could have filled a niche – energy combo guard off the bench – well and cheaply.
now, for everyone’s sake, he should be moved.

By: Max

Max — Sat, 10 Mar 2012 05:03:21 +0000

I meant there was more value in keeping him.

By: Patrick Hayes

Patrick Hayes — Sat, 10 Mar 2012 04:04:12 +0000

Eh, I don’t think he has more value than that. He’s 29, he’s had injury issues the last two seasons now and when he has played this season, his numbers are way down, largely a result of injuries/inconsistent role, but still … those things all make his value pretty minimal I think.

By: Max

Max — Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:17:55 +0000

I wouldn’t mind seeing him stay until the off season as most teams carry at least three options at the point and he could have more value here if BG is traded or amnestied. What could they get anyway? I gotta think he’s more valuable than a 2nd pick.