<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baby steps: Pistons limit turnovers in loss to Nets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/02/baby-steps-pistons-limit-turnovers-in-loss-to-nets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/02/baby-steps-pistons-limit-turnovers-in-loss-to-nets/</link>
	<description>Your Go-To Source For Pistons Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 05:07:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarsier</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/02/baby-steps-pistons-limit-turnovers-in-loss-to-nets/comment-page-1/#comment-47640</link>
		<dc:creator>tarsier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=8841#comment-47640</guid>
		<description>Washed up typically means old and past prime to the point of no longer being serviceable. I&#039;ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you didn&#039;t mean that. What did you mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washed up typically means old and past prime to the point of no longer being serviceable. I&#8217;ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you didn&#8217;t mean that. What did you mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarsier</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/02/baby-steps-pistons-limit-turnovers-in-loss-to-nets/comment-page-1/#comment-47639</link>
		<dc:creator>tarsier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=8841#comment-47639</guid>
		<description>Also, OKC&#039;s picks were 2 (Durant), 3 (Harden), 4 (Westbrook), 5 (Green), and 21 (Ibaka). Yes, much better than 7, 8, 15 and 15. But nobody compares the Pistons to OKC. The only time OKC is brought up is as an example of how bottoming out can be a good/important thing. Finally, if you are right, and tons of teams get good players next draft anyway so it doesn&#039;t really matter where Detroit picks, then that would just mean that they may well still be on the bottom next year for a continued bottoming out. A) you&#039;re wrong and even in a deep draft there are better players at the top. B) let&#039;s say a decent run consists of 6 consecutive playoffs trips; then you have to be prepared to expect 6 consecutive lottery trips when rebuilding (if you have an average GM). The Pistons are discouraging these days and could have done a better job of rolling over assets, butthis looks to be a pretty average rebuild. Not a record breaking, wow this is the height of GM incompetence, spending 20 years in the lottery rebuild. If 20 years from now, the Pistons have only made the playoffs a couple times at most, I&#039;ll apologize and concede that you were onto something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, OKC&#8217;s picks were 2 (Durant), 3 (Harden), 4 (Westbrook), 5 (Green), and 21 (Ibaka). Yes, much better than 7, 8, 15 and 15. But nobody compares the Pistons to OKC. The only time OKC is brought up is as an example of how bottoming out can be a good/important thing. Finally, if you are right, and tons of teams get good players next draft anyway so it doesn&#8217;t really matter where Detroit picks, then that would just mean that they may well still be on the bottom next year for a continued bottoming out. A) you&#8217;re wrong and even in a deep draft there are better players at the top. B) let&#8217;s say a decent run consists of 6 consecutive playoffs trips; then you have to be prepared to expect 6 consecutive lottery trips when rebuilding (if you have an average GM). The Pistons are discouraging these days and could have done a better job of rolling over assets, butthis looks to be a pretty average rebuild. Not a record breaking, wow this is the height of GM incompetence, spending 20 years in the lottery rebuild. If 20 years from now, the Pistons have only made the playoffs a couple times at most, I&#8217;ll apologize and concede that you were onto something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarsier</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/02/baby-steps-pistons-limit-turnovers-in-loss-to-nets/comment-page-1/#comment-47638</link>
		<dc:creator>tarsier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=8841#comment-47638</guid>
		<description>Ok, check that, there is apparently still an apologist who, like many commenters, does not appear to know what the woed apologist means (hint: it&#039;s not one who apologizes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, check that, there is apparently still an apologist who, like many commenters, does not appear to know what the woed apologist means (hint: it&#8217;s not one who apologizes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Drummond</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/02/baby-steps-pistons-limit-turnovers-in-loss-to-nets/comment-page-1/#comment-47625</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Drummond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=8841#comment-47625</guid>
		<description>Not a good idea. better draft me. i got size and some offensive skill sets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a good idea. better draft me. i got size and some offensive skill sets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/02/baby-steps-pistons-limit-turnovers-in-loss-to-nets/comment-page-1/#comment-47618</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=8841#comment-47618</guid>
		<description>still we need drummond by all means, davis is washed up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still we need drummond by all means, davis is washed up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Feldman</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/02/baby-steps-pistons-limit-turnovers-in-loss-to-nets/comment-page-1/#comment-47587</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Feldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=8841#comment-47587</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Enes Kanter, Kyrie Irving, Tobias Harris and Bismack Biyombo are younger than Knight.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enes Kanter, Kyrie Irving, Tobias Harris and Bismack Biyombo are younger than Knight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/02/baby-steps-pistons-limit-turnovers-in-loss-to-nets/comment-page-1/#comment-47586</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=8841#comment-47586</guid>
		<description>I looked it up.....they must have given out bad info during broadcast because he is the 5th youngest---and Biyombo is the youngest if you believe his age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked it up&#8230;..they must have given out bad info during broadcast because he is the 5th youngest&#8212;and Biyombo is the youngest if you believe his age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/02/baby-steps-pistons-limit-turnovers-in-loss-to-nets/comment-page-1/#comment-47585</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=8841#comment-47585</guid>
		<description>They said he would be so draft night so he was the youngest player drafted.  If you know an undrafted rookie who is younger, name him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They said he would be so draft night so he was the youngest player drafted.  If you know an undrafted rookie who is younger, name him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/02/baby-steps-pistons-limit-turnovers-in-loss-to-nets/comment-page-1/#comment-47582</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=8841#comment-47582</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve loved Joe Dumars since about 1987 and he&#039;s done nothing to interrupt my love for even a second.  I can&#039;t be an apologist because I never had anything against him in the first place and I understand that there is no GM for whom I can&#039;t nit pick and find some bad moves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve loved Joe Dumars since about 1987 and he&#8217;s done nothing to interrupt my love for even a second.  I can&#8217;t be an apologist because I never had anything against him in the first place and I understand that there is no GM for whom I can&#8217;t nit pick and find some bad moves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Feldman</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2012/02/baby-steps-pistons-limit-turnovers-in-loss-to-nets/comment-page-1/#comment-47572</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Feldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/?p=8841#comment-47572</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;He is definitely not the league&#039;s youngest player.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is definitely not the league&#8217;s youngest player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
