Comments on: Dave Checketts’ term with Pistons may have ended, but time in NBA might not http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/08/dave-checketts-term-with-pistons-may-have-ended-but-time-in-nba-might-not/ Your Go-To Source For Pistons Coverage Sun, 19 May 2013 22:31:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: laser teeth whitening denver http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/08/dave-checketts-term-with-pistons-may-have-ended-but-time-in-nba-might-not/comment-page-1/#comment-145107 laser teeth whitening denver Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:48:11 +0000 http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/08/dave-checketts-term-with-pistons-may-have-ended-but-time-in-nba-might-not/#comment-145107 Please let me know if you're looking for a article writer for your site. You have some really great posts and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I'd absolutely love to write some content for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please send me an email if interested. Thanks! Please let me know if you’re looking for a article writer for your site. You have some really great posts and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d absolutely
love to write some content for your blog in exchange
for a link back to mine. Please send me an email if interested.
Thanks!

]]> By: aksaray firmalar http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/08/dave-checketts-term-with-pistons-may-have-ended-but-time-in-nba-might-not/comment-page-1/#comment-36760 aksaray firmalar Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:28:48 +0000 http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/08/dave-checketts-term-with-pistons-may-have-ended-but-time-in-nba-might-not/#comment-36760 <strong>favori oyunlar...</strong> Emre Ayd?n Kagit Evler Albümü... favori oyunlar…

Emre Ayd?n Kagit Evler Albümü…

]]> By: khandor http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/08/dave-checketts-term-with-pistons-may-have-ended-but-time-in-nba-might-not/comment-page-1/#comment-33871 khandor Tue, 02 Aug 2011 16:49:10 +0000 http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/08/dave-checketts-term-with-pistons-may-have-ended-but-time-in-nba-might-not/#comment-33871 <!--[if gte mso 9]> Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]> <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>--> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;} Dan, When you say something along the lines of: <em>"Unless more information emerges, I’m sticking with my theory: If the choice were completely up to Dumars, he would’ve hired Mike Woodson,"</em> then, you are choosing to believe hearsay like this: <em>" ... several people around the league believe he preferred former Hawks coach Mike Woodson to Frank,"</em> rather than factual information. Not sure the reason you would choose to do this, considering that the same article from David Aldridge also contains additional hearsay: <em>“Yet a source insisted this weekend that Dumars concurred with Gores that Frank was the right choice for the job,”</em> which directly contradicts the hearsay you are choosing to believe instead.

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:”";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0cm;
mso-para-margin-right:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0cm;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

Dan,
When you say something along the lines of:
“Unless more information emerges, I’m sticking with my theory: If the choice were completely up to Dumars, he would’ve hired Mike Woodson,”
then, you are choosing to believe hearsay like this:
” … several people around the league believe he preferred former Hawks coach Mike Woodson to Frank,”
rather than factual information.
Not sure the reason you would choose to do this, considering that the same article from David Aldridge also contains additional hearsay:
“Yet a source insisted this weekend that Dumars concurred with Gores that Frank was the right choice for the job,”
which directly contradicts the hearsay you are choosing to believe instead.

]]>