<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do you grade the Pistons&#8217; draft?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/</link>
	<description>Your Go-To Source For Pistons Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:21:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oats</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-32091</link>
		<dc:creator>oats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 06:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/#comment-32091</guid>
		<description>There is value in making the playoffs with a core of young players that aren&#039;t ready to contend. Making it there to get Monroe, Knight, and maybe Daye or Jerebko accustomed to the playoffs is actually a fine goal. Plus, Detroit is not exactly a target destination for pretty much anyone. The only way it could be some place guys would actually want to go is if the team is good. Again, young playoff team fits the bill.
 
I do know what you are talking about though. You are talking about the treadmill, or the wheel, or any of a number of other names for the phenomenon. Essentially the theory states that the best way to get talent is to draft players high in the draft. By being good enough to make the playoffs, you don&#039;t get those players. Instead you keep adding middling players through free agency and mid round draft picks that keep you in the playoffs without improving. As a result, the team gets stuck in a rut and can&#039;t get out without making the team worse to get another high draft pick to start again. Essentially, think the Hawks. The problem with this line of thinking of simple. By intentionally staying bad, you institute a culture of losing.
 
Personally I think trying to make the playoffs is a fine goal, that way guys like Monroe feel like they are getting something from all the hard work they are putting in. The last thing you want is the team to decide it is pointless and become a bunch of quitters that walk out on their coach... Oh, wait, that was us. Never mind. Ok, now that I got that joke in, I do agree we are a young piece or two away from trying to make a run at the playoffs. I do actually think there is danger in allowing the team to stay bad though. I&#039;ll sign off on another bad year if our young guys show signs of development and we land a decent prospect in the draft, but then it&#039;s time to pull the team out of the basement and see what we have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is value in making the playoffs with a core of young players that aren&#8217;t ready to contend. Making it there to get Monroe, Knight, and maybe Daye or Jerebko accustomed to the playoffs is actually a fine goal. Plus, Detroit is not exactly a target destination for pretty much anyone. The only way it could be some place guys would actually want to go is if the team is good. Again, young playoff team fits the bill.<br />
 <br />
I do know what you are talking about though. You are talking about the treadmill, or the wheel, or any of a number of other names for the phenomenon. Essentially the theory states that the best way to get talent is to draft players high in the draft. By being good enough to make the playoffs, you don&#8217;t get those players. Instead you keep adding middling players through free agency and mid round draft picks that keep you in the playoffs without improving. As a result, the team gets stuck in a rut and can&#8217;t get out without making the team worse to get another high draft pick to start again. Essentially, think the Hawks. The problem with this line of thinking of simple. By intentionally staying bad, you institute a culture of losing.<br />
 <br />
Personally I think trying to make the playoffs is a fine goal, that way guys like Monroe feel like they are getting something from all the hard work they are putting in. The last thing you want is the team to decide it is pointless and become a bunch of quitters that walk out on their coach&#8230; Oh, wait, that was us. Never mind. Ok, now that I got that joke in, I do agree we are a young piece or two away from trying to make a run at the playoffs. I do actually think there is danger in allowing the team to stay bad though. I&#8217;ll sign off on another bad year if our young guys show signs of development and we land a decent prospect in the draft, but then it&#8217;s time to pull the team out of the basement and see what we have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RussellC</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-32090</link>
		<dc:creator>RussellC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 06:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/#comment-32090</guid>
		<description>They should at least be fun to watch again. I&#039;m out here in Phoenix and I refuse to become a Suns fan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should at least be fun to watch again. I&#8217;m out here in Phoenix and I refuse to become a Suns fan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RussellC</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-32089</link>
		<dc:creator>RussellC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 06:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/#comment-32089</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the new owner is the patient kind that will tolerate announced attendance of 13 to 14k when just a few years ago the Pistons lead the league in attendance. People will come out to see a team that competes and cares and has a chance to win. Look at OKC and the other up and comers they went out in the first round last year and this year the conference finals. Look at Memphis. No need to keep tanking seasons in order to get lottery picks start trading some of these guys and pick up some additional picks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the new owner is the patient kind that will tolerate announced attendance of 13 to 14k when just a few years ago the Pistons lead the league in attendance. People will come out to see a team that competes and cares and has a chance to win. Look at OKC and the other up and comers they went out in the first round last year and this year the conference finals. Look at Memphis. No need to keep tanking seasons in order to get lottery picks start trading some of these guys and pick up some additional picks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laser</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-32087</link>
		<dc:creator>Laser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 04:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/#comment-32087</guid>
		<description>1) every team in the east, almost without exception, has &quot;enough talent&quot; to get into the playoffs in the east. because getting into the playoffs in the east is not an accomplishment. if all you do is make the playoffs in the east and serve as some top seeded team&#039;s appetizer, the only thing you&#039;ve &quot;accomplished&quot; is &lt;strong&gt;not missing the playoffs in the east&lt;/strong&gt;, which is an embarrassment unlike any other. but better to be embarrassed for a few years and actually build a team that can compete and be taken seriously than to squeak into the playoffs just to say you did.

2) if joe can find a team who will take daye and charlie v off our hands in exchange for a low post threat, i&#039;ll offer myself to him sexually. and i&#039;ll put that in writing. because joe can&#039;t do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) every team in the east, almost without exception, has &#8220;enough talent&#8221; to get into the playoffs in the east. because getting into the playoffs in the east is not an accomplishment. if all you do is make the playoffs in the east and serve as some top seeded team&#8217;s appetizer, the only thing you&#8217;ve &#8220;accomplished&#8221; is <strong>not missing the playoffs in the east</strong>, which is an embarrassment unlike any other. but better to be embarrassed for a few years and actually build a team that can compete and be taken seriously than to squeak into the playoffs just to say you did.</p>
<p>2) if joe can find a team who will take daye and charlie v off our hands in exchange for a low post threat, i&#8217;ll offer myself to him sexually. and i&#8217;ll put that in writing. because joe can&#8217;t do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laser</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-32086</link>
		<dc:creator>Laser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 04:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/#comment-32086</guid>
		<description>my friend, if we reached for one of the bigs left on the board at #8 (one of the morris twins, i presume), we&#039;d just be going into next year&#039;s draft looking for an upgrade. do you honestly think either of those guys is an actual answer up front? does either one figure to be significantly better than jonas jerebko? with jerebko our likely starter and charlie v on the books, we don&#039;t really have room for another power forward. we&#039;re downright STACKED with flawed power forwards, and i don&#039;t think anyone left on the board represents a significant improvement.

as it is, we certainly drafted a &lt;strong&gt;POTENTIAL&lt;/strong&gt; answer at PG. and we needed a PG badly. i don&#039;t think you could say the same thing about either of the morris kids. next year there will be better big man options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my friend, if we reached for one of the bigs left on the board at #8 (one of the morris twins, i presume), we&#8217;d just be going into next year&#8217;s draft looking for an upgrade. do you honestly think either of those guys is an actual answer up front? does either one figure to be significantly better than jonas jerebko? with jerebko our likely starter and charlie v on the books, we don&#8217;t really have room for another power forward. we&#8217;re downright STACKED with flawed power forwards, and i don&#8217;t think anyone left on the board represents a significant improvement.</p>
<p>as it is, we certainly drafted a <strong>POTENTIAL</strong> answer at PG. and we needed a PG badly. i don&#8217;t think you could say the same thing about either of the morris kids. next year there will be better big man options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laser</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-32085</link>
		<dc:creator>Laser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 04:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/#comment-32085</guid>
		<description>throwing in draft picks is probably the only way we&#039;re ever going to unload these bad contracts, but draft picks are our most valuable commodity right now. i wouldn&#039;t trade a draft pick right now if my life depended on it, unless i was getting a sure-fire All-Star in return. period. until this team starts winning games consistently (i&#039;m thinking in 2 or 3 years, in an absolute best-case scenario), we should hold onto our draft picks for dear life. we&#039;re living in the lottery until further notice.

and &quot;getting to the playoffs&quot; should not be a goal for anyone outside the organization if all you&#039;re going to do is get swept out in the first round. tom gores wants to get into the playoffs because it means he gets to sell playoff tickets. dumars and the team want to get into the playoffs so they&#039;re not so damned embarrassed to be associated with this franchise. fans should not be remotely interested in the playoffs until the team has at least SOME chance of making noise once they get there. at a minimum, they need to be a team that other teams want to avoid in the first round. and, like i said, we&#039;re probably 2-3 years from that in a perfect world. this team is nothing but holes. we have no use for a veteran big man to come in and give us some post scoring and get us into the playoffs in the short term before leaving in free agency. we&#039;re better off building through the draft, because then we&#039;ll end up with players peaking when they can actually do some good.

better to be in the lottery and get a real chance at significant, prolonged improvement than to miss the lottery just so we can get embarrassed by a top seed and barely justify trading a future pick on the basis that we&#039;re just barely out of the lottery. we need a formula for sustained success around here, not a quick fix trip to the playoffs. and with the roster being the mess that it is, that means we need to stay in the lottery for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>throwing in draft picks is probably the only way we&#8217;re ever going to unload these bad contracts, but draft picks are our most valuable commodity right now. i wouldn&#8217;t trade a draft pick right now if my life depended on it, unless i was getting a sure-fire All-Star in return. period. until this team starts winning games consistently (i&#8217;m thinking in 2 or 3 years, in an absolute best-case scenario), we should hold onto our draft picks for dear life. we&#8217;re living in the lottery until further notice.</p>
<p>and &#8220;getting to the playoffs&#8221; should not be a goal for anyone outside the organization if all you&#8217;re going to do is get swept out in the first round. tom gores wants to get into the playoffs because it means he gets to sell playoff tickets. dumars and the team want to get into the playoffs so they&#8217;re not so damned embarrassed to be associated with this franchise. fans should not be remotely interested in the playoffs until the team has at least SOME chance of making noise once they get there. at a minimum, they need to be a team that other teams want to avoid in the first round. and, like i said, we&#8217;re probably 2-3 years from that in a perfect world. this team is nothing but holes. we have no use for a veteran big man to come in and give us some post scoring and get us into the playoffs in the short term before leaving in free agency. we&#8217;re better off building through the draft, because then we&#8217;ll end up with players peaking when they can actually do some good.</p>
<p>better to be in the lottery and get a real chance at significant, prolonged improvement than to miss the lottery just so we can get embarrassed by a top seed and barely justify trading a future pick on the basis that we&#8217;re just barely out of the lottery. we need a formula for sustained success around here, not a quick fix trip to the playoffs. and with the roster being the mess that it is, that means we need to stay in the lottery for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laser</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-32084</link>
		<dc:creator>Laser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 04:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/#comment-32084</guid>
		<description>1) sure, utah has to trade one of their big men. but their big men have value. every one of them has value. some of them have downright tremendous value. the guards we&#039;d like to move, rip and BG, are liabilities. you&#039;d have to pay someone to take them off our hands. this is why you don&#039;t sign average NBA shooting guards to rich, multi-year contracts. this is also why it&#039;s smart to stockpile bigs at basically any price, where you&#039;d have to be a psychopath to sign two non-All-Star shooting guards to eight-figure multi-year contracts. bottom line: we&#039;re sunk. there are 28 teams in the league who can offer utah a more tempting package than we can.

2) the size of our backcourt would be a tremendous problem. &lt;strong&gt;(A)&lt;/strong&gt; like it or not, will bynum and ben gordon are no jason terry and jj barea. not even that close, really. and &lt;strong&gt;(B)&lt;/strong&gt; those guys back up a pretty big starting backcourt. deshawn stevenson is big and strong. jason kidd has great size for a PG and can easily defend opposing SGs. so dallas has the luxury of mixing and matching their combinations and being selective about when they play terry and jj together. if the pistons trade rip, they will be left with a backcourt consisting size-wise of one shooting guard (stuckey), two point guards (knight and BG), one undersized point guard (bynum). i suppose you could slide daye in as a fifth guard when you like the match-up, but we&#039;re thin at SF as it is, and knight/stuckey/gordon are all going to warrant/demand starters&#039; minutes, so the logjam is going to be as bad as it ever was, and the team&#039;s going to suffer. bynum and gordon, unlike terry and barea, just aren&#039;t good enough to compensate for their lack of size, AND we can&#039;t compensate by rotating them with two bigger guards unless we keep or replace rip. we don&#039;t have to guess at it either. we&#039;ve got two seasons of evidence to prove this. if i haven&#039;t made my point, there&#039;s no way you&#039;ll ever get it. but you seem like a nice guy, so hopefully you do. also, gordon is the worst contract on our books by a wide margin.

you seem to be looking at this team through rose-colored glasses. you were probably surprised and disappointed by the team&#039;s performance last year, and you&#039;re setting yourself up for more disappointment. we&#039;re not going to be able to make a truly beneficial trade here (unless we can find a good taker for tayshaun and pull off a lucky sign-and-trade). we have very &lt;strong&gt;VERY&lt;/strong&gt; few trade chips; all of the players who are truly expendable are attached to horrendous contracts, and we can&#039;t really afford to part with any of the players other teams might covet. stuckey might be the only guy who has value and is basically expendable, but i don&#039;t think dumars is going to let him go. dumars would marry stuckey if it were legal in michigan. he said so in a press conference once.

maybe there&#039;s a ghost of a chance that we could package rip and stuckey for whomever the utah jazz care about the least, but i still think any team in the league can beat that offer, and we&#039;d be left with a guard core consisting of three undersized dudes and plenty of work to do.

you&#039;d be better off if you had more realistic expectations about this team&#039;s options, because none of them are particularly good right now. and not because karen davidson tied joe&#039;s hands. joe tied his own hands by giving our four most expendable players (rip, gordon, charlie, max) our four worst contracts. nobody wants these guys, period. we&#039;re not going to be able to trade any of them easily, and certainly not for anything that&#039;s going to make the team better.

you&#039;d also be better off if you got off the &quot;rip&#039;s gotta go&quot; bandwagon. gordon is a much bigger problem on this roster with that contract. much, much bigger problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) sure, utah has to trade one of their big men. but their big men have value. every one of them has value. some of them have downright tremendous value. the guards we&#8217;d like to move, rip and BG, are liabilities. you&#8217;d have to pay someone to take them off our hands. this is why you don&#8217;t sign average NBA shooting guards to rich, multi-year contracts. this is also why it&#8217;s smart to stockpile bigs at basically any price, where you&#8217;d have to be a psychopath to sign two non-All-Star shooting guards to eight-figure multi-year contracts. bottom line: we&#8217;re sunk. there are 28 teams in the league who can offer utah a more tempting package than we can.</p>
<p>2) the size of our backcourt would be a tremendous problem. <strong>(A)</strong> like it or not, will bynum and ben gordon are no jason terry and jj barea. not even that close, really. and <strong>(B)</strong> those guys back up a pretty big starting backcourt. deshawn stevenson is big and strong. jason kidd has great size for a PG and can easily defend opposing SGs. so dallas has the luxury of mixing and matching their combinations and being selective about when they play terry and jj together. if the pistons trade rip, they will be left with a backcourt consisting size-wise of one shooting guard (stuckey), two point guards (knight and BG), one undersized point guard (bynum). i suppose you could slide daye in as a fifth guard when you like the match-up, but we&#8217;re thin at SF as it is, and knight/stuckey/gordon are all going to warrant/demand starters&#8217; minutes, so the logjam is going to be as bad as it ever was, and the team&#8217;s going to suffer. bynum and gordon, unlike terry and barea, just aren&#8217;t good enough to compensate for their lack of size, AND we can&#8217;t compensate by rotating them with two bigger guards unless we keep or replace rip. we don&#8217;t have to guess at it either. we&#8217;ve got two seasons of evidence to prove this. if i haven&#8217;t made my point, there&#8217;s no way you&#8217;ll ever get it. but you seem like a nice guy, so hopefully you do. also, gordon is the worst contract on our books by a wide margin.</p>
<p>you seem to be looking at this team through rose-colored glasses. you were probably surprised and disappointed by the team&#8217;s performance last year, and you&#8217;re setting yourself up for more disappointment. we&#8217;re not going to be able to make a truly beneficial trade here (unless we can find a good taker for tayshaun and pull off a lucky sign-and-trade). we have very <strong>VERY</strong> few trade chips; all of the players who are truly expendable are attached to horrendous contracts, and we can&#8217;t really afford to part with any of the players other teams might covet. stuckey might be the only guy who has value and is basically expendable, but i don&#8217;t think dumars is going to let him go. dumars would marry stuckey if it were legal in michigan. he said so in a press conference once.</p>
<p>maybe there&#8217;s a ghost of a chance that we could package rip and stuckey for whomever the utah jazz care about the least, but i still think any team in the league can beat that offer, and we&#8217;d be left with a guard core consisting of three undersized dudes and plenty of work to do.</p>
<p>you&#8217;d be better off if you had more realistic expectations about this team&#8217;s options, because none of them are particularly good right now. and not because karen davidson tied joe&#8217;s hands. joe tied his own hands by giving our four most expendable players (rip, gordon, charlie, max) our four worst contracts. nobody wants these guys, period. we&#8217;re not going to be able to trade any of them easily, and certainly not for anything that&#8217;s going to make the team better.</p>
<p>you&#8217;d also be better off if you got off the &#8220;rip&#8217;s gotta go&#8221; bandwagon. gordon is a much bigger problem on this roster with that contract. much, much bigger problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laser</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-32083</link>
		<dc:creator>Laser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 04:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/#comment-32083</guid>
		<description>note that i never said he was a better passer than stuckey-- just a better decision maker. there&#039;s a difference. i think the kid can improve his handles by a lot and develop into a good point guard. at this point in his career, four years in, anybody who sincerely thinks stuckey still has the potential to run an NBA offense are Joe Dumars, Rodney Stuckey, and the criminally insane.

kid&#039;s a project for sure, but i&#039;d feel comfortable starting him at the point from day one and letting him learn on the job. he&#039;ll be far from perfect, he&#039;ll make a lot of mistakes, but he&#039;ll instantly be a better option than stuckey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>note that i never said he was a better passer than stuckey&#8211; just a better decision maker. there&#8217;s a difference. i think the kid can improve his handles by a lot and develop into a good point guard. at this point in his career, four years in, anybody who sincerely thinks stuckey still has the potential to run an NBA offense are Joe Dumars, Rodney Stuckey, and the criminally insane.</p>
<p>kid&#8217;s a project for sure, but i&#8217;d feel comfortable starting him at the point from day one and letting him learn on the job. he&#8217;ll be far from perfect, he&#8217;ll make a lot of mistakes, but he&#8217;ll instantly be a better option than stuckey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-32079</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/#comment-32079</guid>
		<description>Good to see most folks disagree with the nonsense these guys have been spouting about this draft. Brandon Knight will be a star, I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see most folks disagree with the nonsense these guys have been spouting about this draft. Brandon Knight will be a star, I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RussellC</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-32078</link>
		<dc:creator>RussellC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/06/how-do-you-grade-the-pistons-draft/#comment-32078</guid>
		<description>This team as currently constructed has some talent. Enough talent to get into the playoffs in the East. Especially if they get a coach that knows what he&#039;s doing. Its still a flawed team but Stuckey, Knight and whichever one of Rip or BG they keep is pretty potent backcourt. Bring back Prince and trade Daye and Charlie V for a big thats not scared of the lane. Take a chance on Oden. I really wish they made a move to get Singleton.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This team as currently constructed has some talent. Enough talent to get into the playoffs in the East. Especially if they get a coach that knows what he&#8217;s doing. Its still a flawed team but Stuckey, Knight and whichever one of Rip or BG they keep is pretty potent backcourt. Bring back Prince and trade Daye and Charlie V for a big thats not scared of the lane. Take a chance on Oden. I really wish they made a move to get Singleton.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
