↓ Login/Logout ↓
↓ Roster ↓
↓ Archives ↓
↓ About ↓

Let’s not get carried away with Richard Hamilton praise

Of all current and healthy NBA players not in a team’s rotation, I’ll acknowledge Richard Hamilton has probably had the most distinguished career. But the local media shouldn’t stick up for him quite so much.

First, Vince Ellis of the Detroit Free Press wrote the following about John Kuester:

He could not escape the growing evidence that the team plays better without Hamilton — and that’s not assigning any kind of blame. (emphasis mine)

I understand why Kuester won’t admit Hamilton’s benching was performance-related, instead insisting it was merely a random attempt to reduce the rotation and turn around a losing season. But Kuester is distorting facts, at best. Ellis, an objective writer, doesn’t need to do that.

Hamilton absolutely deserves blame for losing his rotation spot. He takes a lot of shots and makes very few of them. Other aspects of his game are OK, but he doesn’t excel at any of them. Frankly, he doesn’t deserve to play regularly right now, and that’s why the Pistons are better with him on the bench.

Then, Vincent Goodwill of The Detroit News wrote:

They know that every night until the saga is resolved, Hamilton sees a player on the opposing team he often got the better of. Wednesday it was Boston’s Ray Allen. Next it’ll be Vince Carter (Phoenix), Jason Richardson (Orlando) and Chauncey Billups (Denver).

That sounds nice, but Allen, Carter, Richardson and Billups are some of the NBA’s top guards. Does Hamilton really match up well with them?

Hamilton’s main role has always been as a scorer and doing what he can to limit the offensive output of his opponent. With that in mind, I devised a scoring system to rate each matchup between Hamilton and the four players Goodwill mentioned. In each game, a player can earn two wins – one for scoring more points and one for having a better true-shooting percentage.

Here’s how Hamilton stacked up:

Richard Hamilton vs. Ray Allen

View the matchup

Points: 7-18-3

True-shooting percentage: 9-19

Total: 16-37-3

Richard Hamilton vs. Vince Carter

View the matchup

Points: 17-19-2

True-shooting percentage: 21-17

Total: 38-36-2

Richard Hamilton vs. Jason Richardson

View the matchup

Points: 9-6

True-shooting percentage: 6-9

Total: 15-15

Richard Hamilton vs. Chauncey Billups

View the matchup

Points: 2-2

True-shooting percentage: 1-3

Total: 3-5


Points: 35-45-5

True-shooting percentage: 37-48

Total: 72-93

Allen has dominated Hamilton over the years, and Hamilton is approximately breaking even with Carter, Richardson and Billups.

Hamilton had (is having?) a fine career, but when you hold him against the league’s top guards, he’s probably going to fall short. I guess in a very technical sense, Hamilton often got the better of those four because, when you play 11 years, you’re bound to get some go your way.

But relatively, Hamilton fell short – just likes he’s been doing against everyone this season.


  • Jan 22, 20114:43 pm
    by detroitpcb


    The problem with benching Rip is that his replacement, Ben Gordon, is not playing one whit better. I do not have the stats in front of me but i bet there is very little difference between Hamiltons shooting percentege and Ben Gordon’s. They both make bad turnovers, though i suspect Gordon has more based on minutes played. Neither is a great defender but Rip is certainly a better defender than Ben Gordon so…….this really comes down to Q.

  • Jan 22, 201110:14 pm
    by gmehl1977


    You are probably right that both are playing poorly but there are a couple of factors that make the decision to play Gordon instead of Hamilton easier. 1) Gordon spaces the floor better than Rip due to his range that defenders have to respect. It doesn’t matter if he is 0-10 he can get hot like that. 2) They were/are going to trade Rip. 3) Gordon is obviously going to be here for the long haul unless something dramatically changes. 4) Gordon has never had a problem starting on the bench and doesn’t need as many shots as Rip to be effective. 5) Look at the way Rip has treated Kuester even before he lost his starting spot.
    I am not a BG lover but it is clear why Kuester is going with him instead of Rip.

  • Jan 22, 201110:22 pm
    by gmehl1977


    Also as much as i want to see Rip traded for the sake of the pistons i want to see him traded so he can play again. It kills me to see Rip go through what he is now cause it is a crappy situation for anyone t be going through. Say what you want about Rip but EVERY game he has sat on the bench he has been cheer leading the guys that have been playing which i think says a lot about him. At least he hasn’t done an Iverson and faked an injury and sat at home the whole time. That could change if things get uglier but i would be very surprised if Rip pulled that kind of thing.
    At the end of the day by letting Rip play for the pistons again would be like going back to an old girlfriend after you got rejected by another girl. Going back again just seems like sloppy seconds!

  • Leave a Reply

    Your Ad Here