<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In defense of Ben Gordon and Charlie Villanueva</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/</link>
	<description>Your Go-To Source For Pistons Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:53:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Feldman</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/comment-page-1/#comment-4946</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Feldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/#comment-4946</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Joyce, I&#039;m not sure how much better Gordon can get on defense. He tries, he&#039;s just not adept. Villanueva is a completely different story. He has potential to be much, much better.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joyce, I&#8217;m not sure how much better Gordon can get on defense. He tries, he&#8217;s just not adept. Villanueva is a completely different story. He has potential to be much, much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/comment-page-1/#comment-4908</link>
		<dc:creator>joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 04:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/#comment-4908</guid>
		<description>Ben Gordon and Charlie V  are a good combination. I bet next year they will light it up. Maybe get a little better on defense but they are ok in my book and like both of them. We  need to keep Will Bynum for a backup point guard. But with the ridiculous signing of players BG  and CV was a steal. They were hurt so don&#039;t count last season. Our team will be good. I expect them to be in the playoffs this season. Go Pistons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Gordon and Charlie V  are a good combination. I bet next year they will light it up. Maybe get a little better on defense but they are ok in my book and like both of them. We  need to keep Will Bynum for a backup point guard. But with the ridiculous signing of players BG  and CV was a steal. They were hurt so don&#8217;t count last season. Our team will be good. I expect them to be in the playoffs this season. Go Pistons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/comment-page-1/#comment-3536</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/#comment-3536</guid>
		<description>ri
W
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ri<br />
W<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/comment-page-1/#comment-3534</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/#comment-3534</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m not going to give them a pass because they have one stat that they might live up to again at a later date. their deficiencies are far greater than just a down year for each in a specific category. and considering the lack of success with their previous clubs i might argue that simply being pressured to cover up some of their own glaring and inexcusable  inadequacies has taken it&#039;s toll on things they previously put all of their focus. it&#039;s easier to drain threes or get rebounds when that is the only part of the game you pay attention to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m not going to give them a pass because they have one stat that they might live up to again at a later date. their deficiencies are far greater than just a down year for each in a specific category. and considering the lack of success with their previous clubs i might argue that simply being pressured to cover up some of their own glaring and inexcusable  inadequacies has taken it&#8217;s toll on things they previously put all of their focus. it&#8217;s easier to drain threes or get rebounds when that is the only part of the game you pay attention to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thursday Links &#8211; Ben Roethlisberger Suspended, Nats Calling Up Stephen Strasburg in May, Hot Tickets for The Big Chill, &#38; Toby Gerhart Thinks Being White Is Hurting His Draft Status &#124; detroit.rssible.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/comment-page-1/#comment-3533</link>
		<dc:creator>Thursday Links &#8211; Ben Roethlisberger Suspended, Nats Calling Up Stephen Strasburg in May, Hot Tickets for The Big Chill, &#38; Toby Gerhart Thinks Being White Is Hurting His Draft Status &#124; detroit.rssible.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/#comment-3533</guid>
		<description>[...] expect to see: Nightmare on Helm Street commends Versus for a job well done (so far), and Piston Powered defends Charlie Villanueva and Ben Gordon.    Today&#8217;s random video and highlight after the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expect to see: Nightmare on Helm Street commends Versus for a job well done (so far), and Piston Powered defends Charlie Villanueva and Ben Gordon.    Today&#8217;s random video and highlight after the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Simmington</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/comment-page-1/#comment-3532</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Simmington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/#comment-3532</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;GET YA MIND RIGHT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GET YA MIND RIGHT&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GET YA MIND RIGHT</p>
<p>GET YA MIND RIGHT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Feldman</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/comment-page-1/#comment-3530</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Feldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/#comment-3530</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;BRGulker, I think that&#039;s a lot of great analysis. I didn&#039;t realize Gordon had shot so much inside this year than he had done previously. But a majority of his shots still come from the outside, so I think it shows something isn&#039;t right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This year was introverted from his usual production (more efficient inside than out, as opposed to vice versa).  I think that&#039;s a sign you can&#039;t say, &quot;he is what he is.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If his 3-point shooting returns to his career average next year, I don&#039;t necessarily think his inside shooting will remain as strong as it was this year. But it certainly could. That&#039;ll be interesting to see how it plays out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRGulker, I think that&#8217;s a lot of great analysis. I didn&#8217;t realize Gordon had shot so much inside this year than he had done previously. But a majority of his shots still come from the outside, so I think it shows something isn&#8217;t right.</p>
<p>This year was introverted from his usual production (more efficient inside than out, as opposed to vice versa).  I think that&#8217;s a sign you can&#8217;t say, &#8220;he is what he is.&#8221;</p>
<p>If his 3-point shooting returns to his career average next year, I don&#8217;t necessarily think his inside shooting will remain as strong as it was this year. But it certainly could. That&#8217;ll be interesting to see how it plays out.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Feldman</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/comment-page-1/#comment-3528</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Feldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/#comment-3528</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think starting late in the season was what Gordon needed to get back on track. But once his mind is right (not sure if it&#039;s there yet), I think he&#039;ll be OK coming off the bench.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think starting late in the season was what Gordon needed to get back on track. But once his mind is right (not sure if it&#8217;s there yet), I think he&#8217;ll be OK coming off the bench.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 10-man rotation, starring some offensive defenders &#124; dunksdunk.com Nike Dunks Online Store&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/comment-page-1/#comment-3522</link>
		<dc:creator>The 10-man rotation, starring some offensive defenders &#124; dunksdunk.com Nike Dunks Online Store&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 06:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/#comment-3522</guid>
		<description>[...] going.7th: Fat Shawn Kemp. This is definitely J.E. Skeets&#8217; favorite post of all-time.8th: Piston Powered. In defense of Ben Gordon(notes) and Charlie Villanueva(notes).9th: Order of the Court. Inside the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] going.7th: Fat Shawn Kemp. This is definitely J.E. Skeets&#8217; favorite post of all-time.8th: Piston Powered. In defense of Ben Gordon(notes) and Charlie Villanueva(notes).9th: Order of the Court. Inside the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brgulker</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/comment-page-1/#comment-3518</link>
		<dc:creator>brgulker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2010/04/in-defense-of-ben-gordon-and-charlie-villanueva/#comment-3518</guid>
		<description>One thing that I try to keep in mind when evaluating Gordon is this: in spite of the drop in his 3PT%, his overall shooting (and hence scoring) efficiency is well within the range we&#039;d expect if we look at the bigger picture of his career.
Specifically, excluding this season, Ben Gordon has scored 1.24 points per shot attempt (career prior to this season, TS% .552, eFG% .500). This season, he scored 1.22 points per shot attempt (TS% .524, eFG% .470).  Yes, his shooting percentages dropped, but when compared with his complete body of work, it&#039;s within what we might expect.
There&#039;s an upside and a downside there that can be argued, I think. Upside: He found to score points when his 3 wasn&#039;t falling. Downside: If he  returns to form, the level of offensive efficiency we saw last season isn&#039;t going to a dramatic departure from career norms (think in terms of law of averages).
Every other statistical category is almost unchanged if you compare this season with previous season.
The conclusion (which I view as a major, major problem going forward): &lt;strong&gt;Ben Gordon is what he is.&lt;/strong&gt; Give him minutes and shot attempts, and you&#039;re gonna get about 1.2 points for every shot he takes -- which is good, not great -- and very little else (not much D, not much creation for teammates, few assists and steals, about average TO&#039;s).
 
I understand the reluctance to evaluate after this disaster of a season. But honestly, when you look closely at the body of work and compare it to this season, you can see a drop in totals (fewer PPGs as a result of fewer shot attempts, e.g.), but you don&#039;t see a radical drop in overall efficiency. I don&#039;t see much reason to be hesitant about stating that.
 
P.S.
Some random comparables in terms of shooting efficiency, SGs who shoot 3&#039;s and are highly paid -- Rip, 1.19 pts/shot, Joe Johson, 1.15, Manu, 1.41, Jamal Crawford, 1.16, Vince Carter, 1.22</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that I try to keep in mind when evaluating Gordon is this: in spite of the drop in his 3PT%, his overall shooting (and hence scoring) efficiency is well within the range we&#8217;d expect if we look at the bigger picture of his career.<br />
Specifically, excluding this season, Ben Gordon has scored 1.24 points per shot attempt (career prior to this season, TS% .552, eFG% .500). This season, he scored 1.22 points per shot attempt (TS% .524, eFG% .470).  Yes, his shooting percentages dropped, but when compared with his complete body of work, it&#8217;s within what we might expect.<br />
There&#8217;s an upside and a downside there that can be argued, I think. Upside: He found to score points when his 3 wasn&#8217;t falling. Downside: If he  returns to form, the level of offensive efficiency we saw last season isn&#8217;t going to a dramatic departure from career norms (think in terms of law of averages).<br />
Every other statistical category is almost unchanged if you compare this season with previous season.<br />
The conclusion (which I view as a major, major problem going forward): <strong>Ben Gordon is what he is.</strong> Give him minutes and shot attempts, and you&#8217;re gonna get about 1.2 points for every shot he takes &#8212; which is good, not great &#8212; and very little else (not much D, not much creation for teammates, few assists and steals, about average TO&#8217;s).<br />
 <br />
I understand the reluctance to evaluate after this disaster of a season. But honestly, when you look closely at the body of work and compare it to this season, you can see a drop in totals (fewer PPGs as a result of fewer shot attempts, e.g.), but you don&#8217;t see a radical drop in overall efficiency. I don&#8217;t see much reason to be hesitant about stating that.<br />
 <br />
P.S.<br />
Some random comparables in terms of shooting efficiency, SGs who shoot 3&#8242;s and are highly paid &#8212; Rip, 1.19 pts/shot, Joe Johson, 1.15, Manu, 1.41, Jamal Crawford, 1.16, Vince Carter, 1.22</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

