<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hollinger says Pistons are historically just above mediocre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pistonpowered.com/2009/06/hollinger-says-pistons-are-historically-just-above-mediocre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2009/06/hollinger-says-pistons-are-historically-just-above-mediocre/</link>
	<description>Your Go-To Source For Pistons Coverage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:37:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Peek</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2009/06/hollinger-says-pistons-are-historically-just-above-mediocre/comment-page-1/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Peek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 17:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2009/06/hollinger-says-pistons-are-historically-just-above-mediocre/#comment-750</guid>
		<description>I find it funny that John Hollingers claim to fame is creating simple math equations for basketball and then passing them off as complex. They are almost always his opinion manipulated into a formula that pushes his ideas; maybe he should work for FOX news instead. The fact that he put in an “intangible” stat made me laugh at him once again. Obviously he didn’t want to go on pure stats because then his favorite teams would be shot down. I like Atlanta too John but they are what they are and you can’t help that. One last note JOHN, Forbes just listed the Detroit Pistons as ranked 4th on the NBA Team Valuations 2007. Another bogus formula all shot up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it funny that John Hollingers claim to fame is creating simple math equations for basketball and then passing them off as complex. They are almost always his opinion manipulated into a formula that pushes his ideas; maybe he should work for FOX news instead. The fact that he put in an “intangible” stat made me laugh at him once again. Obviously he didn’t want to go on pure stats because then his favorite teams would be shot down. I like Atlanta too John but they are what they are and you can’t help that. One last note JOHN, Forbes just listed the Detroit Pistons as ranked 4th on the NBA Team Valuations 2007. Another bogus formula all shot up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawn brown</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2009/06/hollinger-says-pistons-are-historically-just-above-mediocre/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>shawn brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2009/06/hollinger-says-pistons-are-historically-just-above-mediocre/#comment-734</guid>
		<description>i dont believe all the moronic nonsense that the clods at espn are always spewing about certain teams  and that includes my beloved pistons ...they are bias against small market teams and they always have been ...the pistons are in the top ten in several play off categories including wins , so how can hollinger claim the pistons are just above mediocre??   last  time i checked they have more championships then cleveland, utah , houston and several other teams .....  to rank them 13th shows these guys are all about hype and no substance ...... you want to know who really is mediocre , try tim leglers so called &quot;basketball i q &quot;  and the espn/abc announcing team of jackson/van gundy/ brheem......talk about brutal!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont believe all the moronic nonsense that the clods at espn are always spewing about certain teams  and that includes my beloved pistons &#8230;they are bias against small market teams and they always have been &#8230;the pistons are in the top ten in several play off categories including wins , so how can hollinger claim the pistons are just above mediocre??   last  time i checked they have more championships then cleveland, utah , houston and several other teams &#8230;..  to rank them 13th shows these guys are all about hype and no substance &#8230;&#8230; you want to know who really is mediocre , try tim leglers so called &#8220;basketball i q &#8221;  and the espn/abc announcing team of jackson/van gundy/ brheem&#8230;&#8230;talk about brutal!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Cato</title>
		<link>http://www.pistonpowered.com/2009/06/hollinger-says-pistons-are-historically-just-above-mediocre/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pistonpowered.com/2009/06/hollinger-says-pistons-are-historically-just-above-mediocre/#comment-733</guid>
		<description>DETROIT PISTONS: 49.19 POINTS PER SEASON (1948-2009)
Wins: 2,368
Playoff wins: 182
Series wins: 44
Titles: 3
All-Stars: 101
Best player: Isiah Thomas
Best coach: Chuck Daly
Best team: 1988-89 (63-19, won title)
Intangibles: -50. Palace Brawl leaves stain; slow-paced teams lacked excitement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DETROIT PISTONS: 49.19 POINTS PER SEASON (1948-2009)<br />
Wins: 2,368<br />
Playoff wins: 182<br />
Series wins: 44<br />
Titles: 3<br />
All-Stars: 101<br />
Best player: Isiah Thomas<br />
Best coach: Chuck Daly<br />
Best team: 1988-89 (63-19, won title)<br />
Intangibles: -50. Palace Brawl leaves stain; slow-paced teams lacked excitement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

